Wyatt v. Commonwealth Of Virginia, No. 7:2013cv00442 - Document 2 (W.D. Va. 2013)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge James C. Turk on 09/30/2013. (kab)

Download PDF
I TH E U N I N TED STATE S D I STR I C O U RT CT FOR THE W ESTERN DISTRI OF VI NI CT RGI A R O A NO K E D I I O N V SI M I AEL E . Y A TT, CH W C ERK' oFii e t. Dl cour S zl ls. sm z AT ROANOKE, A V FI LED sEF 3û 2 1 23 JUL BY; CA SE NO .7: 13CV 00442 U EY CLERK DE PUW CL M E Pktt oner, ii M EM O R AN DU M O PINIO N CO M M O NW EA LTH O F V I G I I , R N A By: Jam e C.Turk s Se orUnie St t sDit i tJudge ni t d a e sr c R espondent . M i ha E.W ya t a Vigi a i t pr e ng pr K ,fld t s pe ii on a f m c el t, r ni nma e oce di o ie hi tton or de i d fri t s ki awrtofha sc pusunde 28U. C.j2241 whihi g neal sgne o nmaes ee ng i bea or r S. , c s e rly us t cha lnge exe utc of f r l s nt es Bec us W y t i c t s hi i e i t ed o le c im ede a e enc . a e at ndia e s nt nton o c le e t valdiy of hi de e i unde a sae c u tj d me t t c u tc nsr e hs ha lng he i t s t nton r tt o r u g n , he o r o tu s i evi he d, he udes ha peiin asaii unde 28U. C.j2254. Upon r ew oft recor t courtconcl t t tto zsng r S. t p t in mus b s mmai d s se wih u p eudc f rf i te t e ha s sae c u t he ei o t t e u rl imis d t o t rj ie o alr o x u t tt o r y t r edi .1 em es W ya tspeii sa e t thei c le i co di fom ati o J 24,201 a t' tton t t s ha s ha lngng nvi ons r ral n une 3 t t c u t us i Chah m, r ii .Her ie camso j r rmic n u t c u t ro rltdt he o rho e n tn Vign a as s li f u o s o d c, o r er r eae o j r r'q e to s a d ief cie a ssa c o c u e. S ae c u trc r s a albe o ln u o s u sin , n n fe tv sitn e f o ns l tt o r e o d v ia l ni e i c t t tW ya twa c ced i Jme 201 i Pityl ni Co y Cic tCour ofsa u or ndia e ha t s onvi t n t 3 n ts va a unt r ui t ttt y blr a y,g a l c ny,a pos e s on of a fr r as a co c e f l n. 'he c ts nt nc zgl r r nd ar e nd s s i iea m nvi t d e o r our e e ed W ya tt a t alof 25 yea s i prs Alhough W ya tsa es t the di not a al onlne t o ot r n ion. t t tt ha d ppe , i 1 Und rRul 4( o t Ru e Go r n j225 Ca e , t c ur ma s 4 s s he o t y umma i dimisa e e b) f he l s venig rl s s y j225 peiin t ifipli y a e r fom t peiin a d a atc de hi t ta t p tton ri no 4 tto ç l t anl pp a s r he tto n ny ta he x bis h t he eii e s t l enttedt r ifi t diti cour.' il o ele n he srct t' r c dsi c t t thehasadiec a a pe ng i t Cour ofAppe l ofVigi a r lt d t e or ndia e ha r t ppe l ndi n he t as r ni ea e o hi 2013 c c i i Pityl ni Count . s onvitons n ts va a y Un e 2 U. C.j 2 5 1 a fd r lc u tc n o g a ta ha e sp tto t e ste d r 8 S. 2 44 9, e e a o r a n t rn b a eiin mls h pe ii r ha e use t r m e e aval bl i t cou t of t sa e i whih he wa ttone s xha t d he e di s ia e n he rs he t t n c s c ced. The e usi r quie e i s tsi d by s ki r vi w oft cai s tuoughout onvi t xha ton e r m nt s aife ee ng e e he l m , l t e sae c u ts tm,t te hg e tsae c u twi jlidcin t c n ie te cams S e h tt o r yse o h ih s tt o r t t s ito o o sd r h li . e h r O' lva v.Boec l 526 U. 8 8 ( 999) n Vigi a afe hi con ci i t ti Suli n rke, S. 38, 45 1 .l r ni, tr s viton n he ral c t t pe ii r ca fl a diec a a t t Cour of A ppe s of V i g ni wih a our , he ttone n ie r t ppe l o he t al r i a, t s e nt a ubs que ppea t t Supr m e Cour of Vi gi a. A s t d a m s t t ge r l ca l o he e t r ni o i ha ne aly nnot be a es e on a ddr s d ppea,s h as c am s of i f c i as itnc of ti lc ms l t pe ii rs l uc li nefe tve ssa e ra ot e , he ttone ' sae c t e t t our r medi i Vigi ai l tlng a sa eha aspe ii i t cr ui co twhe ehe es n r ni ncude ii tt be tton n he ic t ur r wasco c e w ih a a nvi t d, t n ppea ofa a r e dec s on t t Supr m e Cour ofV igi a, a. l n dve s i i o he e t r ni V Code An j 8. - 5 ()1 'j 1 141 ,o i t atr aie fln a sae ha e spei o dr cl n. 016 4 a( ) 7.- 1 r n he len tv , iig tt b a t in ie t , t y wi t e Su rme Co r o Vigna j8. - 5 ()1 . W hc v r r u e h f l ws i t h pe h u t f r ii. 016 4 a( ) ihe e o t e ol o n e usi sa e co tr m e es a peii ne m us uli ael pr s nthi c am st t Supr m e xha tng t t ur e di , tto r t tm t y e e s l i o he e Cour of Vigi a be or a f de a diti t c t c n c i r t m e is of hi c am s t r t r ni f e e r l src our a onsde he rt s l i mde j2254. As sae r c ds i c t t t W yat has a pendi sa e co ta pe . l addii tt d, e or ndia e ha t ng tt ur p al n ton, W ya t i c t s i hi pe ii t the has ne r t l d a pe ii f a wr tof ha as c pus a t ndi a e n s tton ha ve i e tton or i be or , nd sae c tr co ds a ia e o i a e c it nt wih t s sa e nt Be a e t s r c ds t t our e r val bl nlne r onsse t hi t t me . c us he e e or i ca e t tW ya thas notpr s nt hi c r ntcl i s t t Supr m e Cour ofV igi a eihe ndi t ha t e e ed s ur e a m o he e t r ni , t r on a ppea or i s a e ha a c us pr ee ngs i i cl a t the ha notye e us e ava l bl l n t t be s op oc di , t s e r ha s t xha t d ia e sae c trme e a rquiedunde j225 1 Theef e t sc tmus dimishi j2254 tt our e dis s e r r 4(9. r or, hi our t s s s P tto wih u p eu iez S eS a tn v. mi 4 4 U. 5 ,5 ( 9 )(i d n t a j2 5 eii n t o t rj d c . e lyo S t 0 S. 3 4 1 71 tn i g h t 2 4 h, h b a peiin mus b d s se wi o tp eu iei p tto e ha n tp e e tdh scamst a es t o t t e imisd t u rj dc f eiin r s o r sn e i li o h t a opraesaec ta c d sildos .Ana opraeor rwilis t sda he ppr it tt our nd oul tl o) ppr it de l sue hi y. The Clr i dieced t s nd co e o t s m e and o ni n a a c ek s r t o e pi s f hi mor um pi o nd c ompa ng nyi or rt pe ii . de o ttoner E E T i X d yo Spe e, 0 3 NT R: hs a f etmbr2 1. Se ' nie St t s Di t i t udge t d a e s rc 2 Thec r not t e i W ya tha exhaused hi sat cour r t ste t emedi , hi j225 p tto es s ou t es hat ven f t d 4 eiin do s no ce ry sae t cams h wihe t b i l he de ie t pu s a j2 peiin a tr e t lal tt he li e s s o rng. f cd s o rue 254 tto fe e ha tng saec ur rme e ,h wiln e t p o d s e fc i o main a u t j g nl)hei x usi tt o t e dis e l e d o r vie p cii nf r to bo t he ud me ts s chalç ng and make a mor complt saem entof t consiutonale r s he cl ms and t f s on lngi e ee tt he tt i r or ai he act whi t e cl ms ar bas ch hos ai e ed. For exam pl i he w ihes t cl m t couns pr ded i f tve e, f s o ai hat el ovi nefec i asssance he mus sat f ct conc ni w hathi ator y alegedl advied hi orf l t adviehi , it , tt e a s er ng s t ne l y s m aied o s m why he bele t s advi was det ent and how t advi adver el afect t out ome i hi ives hi ce ici , hat ce s y f ed he c n s c i na c s .Se Src a v.W a hi o 46 U. 6 ,6 9 ( 98 . rmi l a e e tiklnd s ngtn, 6 S. 68 6 1 4) 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.