Adams v. McDonnell et al, No. 7:2013cv00437 - Document 9 (W.D. Va. 2013)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Samuel G. Wilson on 10/30/2013. (tvt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
a p- I THE UNI S N TED TATESDI CT COURT STRI FOR THE W ESTERN DI STRI OF VI I A CT RG M R O A N O K E D I SI VI ON JERRY L. ADAM S, Pl ntf ai if, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) G OV.BOB M CDONNELL,e al, t . Dee fndants. t) oFFI u. . l - cE : D sm ATRoANoe , vA FIED L 02T 32 2 1 23 JULA C. I D BY; DE , C i lA c i N o.7: 3- v- 37 vi ton 1 c 004 M EM O R AN DU M O PI O N NI By: Sam ue G .W is l l on Unied St e Dit i Judge t at s s rct J r y L. dnm s pr ee ng pr K , ie a c vi r g s c pl i , s ntt 42 U . C . er A , oc di o f l d i l i ht om a nt pur ua o S. . 9 98 By Or e e tr dSe e e 2 , 01 ,hec u t ie tdp an ift s b t ti 1 1 3. d r n e e ptmb r 3 2 3 t o r drce litf o u mi wi n 0 h da fom t da eoft Or ra i t a ot f r ,a a c riid c ofpl n ifstts ys r he t he de n nma e cc mt o m nd e tfe opy aitf rzt f nd a ountsaeme f rt m ont ofM a c 201 i e a ey pr c di t flng oft u cc t t nt o he h rh 3 mm dit l e e ng he ii he c pl nt obt i fo t a oprae p ion ofi i lofea h prs a whih pl i ifi or om ai , aned r m he ppr i t rs tc a c ion t c antf s wa c i dtrng t tm ont s onfned li ha h.Pl ntf wasadvied t taf iur t c ai if s ha a l e o ompl woul r s ti y d e ul n d s sa o t sa to wi u p eu c .Plitf s n t c u t lte fldOco e 2 2 3 imis l f hi cin t t rj die an if e t he o r a e tr e t b r , 01 , ho r r ng t di sc t obt ni t i o m a i r quied a r ue t d t tt c t s nd ega di he f uly ai ng he nf r ton e r nd eq s e ha he our e a t e i maea c t fr dr cl t tesafa tej i ise do teplitf. Clr noh r n t c omt o m ie t o h tf t h aln ta f h an if The ek y r pondedt t lte on t s es o he e tr he mne dae by e osng aco oft co tonal fl o dera t ncl i py he ndii ly ied r nd poi e outt s c i on t fr tpa r m i ngpli ifofhi r ponsbiiy t obti nt d he e ton he is ge e ndi antf s es i lt o a n r uie doc e ai On Oc obe 3, 3 t co t e ei d a i omplt i ae a c mt eq r d um nt ton. t r 201 he ur r c ve n nc e e nm t c ot I XPO/. M or t n amont ha e a e a pl i ifhasf ie t c e ha h s l ps d, nd antf a ld o ompl wih t de c i d y t he s rbe c n iins Ac od n l t ec u t imis stea to wi o tp eu iea dsrk stec s o dto . c r i gy,h o r ds se h cin t u rj d c n tie h a e h fom t a tvedoc toft c t Pl i ifma r fl t cai si a s pa ae a ton onc r he c i ke he our. antf y e ie he l m n e r t c i e pl ntf i pr pa ed t compl wih t not d c to . ai if s e r o y t he e ondii ns The Clr i die t d t s ac oft sM e a lm Opi on a a co pa ng e k s r c e o end opy hi mor ndz ni nd c m nyi Or rt pl i if de o a ntf . E ER:T i j5 NT hs . s dyo Ocoe 2013. a f tbr , .Z ' ' '' Unt S ae Ditit u g id tt s src J d e
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
