Williams v. Collins et al, No. 7:2013cv00375 - Document 31 (W.D. Va. 2013)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Glen E. Conrad on 11/19/2013. (kab)

Download PDF
% @ F :F 1 9, D'' Cnlr F*# #* ., :T , l t. $ FC. tK ;V 5 à A 7 F, A . N r/.?i :t, ' r. . - î ' N0V 2 2 2 1 2 I TH E UN I N TED STA TES D I STR I T CO U R T C J A R FO R TH E W ESTER N DI STRI T O F V I G I I BKULI C. ,' ';CLE, K C R N A ROANOKE DI SI N VI O DEP L ERK . G A R Y B UTER R A W I A M S, LLI CA SE N O .7: 3CV 0037 1 5 Pl ntf , ai if M EM OM NDUM OPI NION J COLLI c AL. . NS, , By:Gln E. nr d e Co a C hi fU ni e St t D i t i tJudge e t d a es s r c Deendants. f t) By opi o a or r e e e Ocobe 1 201 t c t s ma iy dimi s d tls ni n nd de nt r d t r 4, 3, he our um rl s s e li p io e cvi rg t a to u d r2 U. C.j1 1 A( )1 f rfiu e t saea cam.Plitf rs n r i l i hs cin n e 8 S. 9 5 b ( ) o alr o tt li anif Gay Bu er W il msn w mo e f rrc n ieain o t a ds sa u d rRue 5 ()a d r tra li n o v s o e o sd rto f h t imis l n e ls 9e n 6 ( o teF d rlRue o Cii Pr c d r .Afe r ve o t emoin,h c u t e isi fr 0b) f h e ea ls f v l o e u e tr e iw f h to te o r d ne t o l c ofm e i. ak rt Si W iln fl hi moi wihi t t nt i da pr de by Rul 59() t nce lims ied s ton t n he we peght ys ovi d e e ,he Co r c nsr e i a aRue 5 ()mo in t atro a n tej g n .Se Le - h ma v. u t o tu s t s l 9 e to o l r me d h ud me t e e- o s e r Prn e Ge r es Cn v P b.S h. 6 6 F.d 2 4 24 n. ( t Ci.2 2 (rai moin t ic o z ' t . u c , 6 3 4 , 7 4 4h r 01 ) te tng to s o r onsde fld wihi t t egh da a Rul 5 e ec i r ie t n weny-i t ys s e 9()motons a motons fld outi i , nd i ie sde t n y eg td y m Ru e6 ( )moins (iig Kav ev.Pe n Na' Gn nm l .6 7 F.d we t -ih a s s l 0 b t ) ctn tl o n tl mi nc, 3 3 4 2 4 n. ( t Ci. 01 ) e plie b t eFo rhCic i, 6 , 71 4 4h r 2 1.As x an d y h u t r ut aRue5 ()moinma o l beg a tdi trestain :E1 t a c mmo ae l 9 e to y ny rn e n h e iu to s ç ) o c o d t ( a itr e ig c a g i c nr ln lw;( )t a c t f rn w e i e c n t n ne v nn h n e n o tol g a 2 o c omt o e v d n e o i a ia e a til or ( t c r t a cla er of 1w or pr ve ma f t valbl t ra; 3) o orec e r ror a e nt nies ij sie' Zi a d v Br wn 4 8 F.d 6 4,6 7 ( t Ci.2 0 ) (iain nu tc . nk n . o , 7 3 3 3 4h r 0 7 ctto s ' omitd) I i ane ror nayrme t ts dbea id s rngl EEOC v. te .t s xta di r e dy ha houl pple pa i y. Loc edMari Co .11 F. 11 11 ( hCi.1 ) khe tn m , 6 3d 0, 2 4t r 997 . M avfedv. tlAs ' f St k CarAut Ra i I ,674F. 369,378(t Ci. 2 . il Na' sn or oc o cng. nc. 3d 4h r 201 ) W iln s moton doe no me t s dema ng sa r le nz r y r as e t li m ' i s t et hi ndi t nda d. l e el e s hs he c us r l alt ores sa e i hi co pl nt He does notpoi t a a tonalf c s oncl o y eg he i t t d n s m ai . nt o ny ddii a t, c a e i lw, rce rer ri 1w o wh c t o i o mus b atr dt c re ta ij tc , h ng s n a o la ro n a n ih he pnin t e l e o o rc n nusie e a t c tfndsnone Fort r as sae i t proropi on,W iln f l t sa e nd he our i . he e ons tt d n he i ni li ms aied o t t s fce f t t pr enta co tmtona cai acina e unde 42 U. C.j 1 ufiint acs o es ny nsi i l l m to bl r S. 983,a nd te eo e t ec u t imis dhsa to wih u p eu ie Hi c re tmo in p o ie nob ss h rf r, h o r d s s e i cin t o t rj dc . s u rn to r vd s a i on whih t at rora e t c tsprorrzi i a wa c o le m nd he our' i t ng n ny y. l Fort r a o sa e t c twilde W ila s m oto he e s ns t t d, he our l ny li m ' i n ENTER:Ths l d yo xo e e, 01 i q a f v mb r2 3. Chi fUnie Sut Diti tJ e td es src udge

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.