Taylor v. Dept. Social Services, No. 7:2013cv00372 - Document 3 (W.D. Va. 2013)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Samuel G. Wilson on 8/14/2013. (tvt)

Download PDF
clERK' OFFI U. DI COUA - s CE B. SI AT ROANOKE, VA Fl uEo AL6 1ù 2 1 23 I TH E UNI N TED STATES DI STRI CO URT CT FO R TH E W ESTER N DISTR I O F VIRG I I CT N A RO A NO K E D I VISIO N JULI . A BY; CH W STO PH ER A.TAYLO R, Pl ntf, ai if C i lActon No.7: cvvi i 13- 00372 V. M EM ORANDUM OPI ON NI DEPT O F SO CIAL SERVICES, D ef endant. c RK By: Sam uelG .W ison l U nie St t s Di t i tJudge t d a e s rc Chrs opherA .Tayl ,a V i ni i at pr it or rgi a nm e oceedi pro s fl t s acton pur uantt t ng e, ied hi i s o he c , ns he Ame ia wih Dia lte Ac o 1 0 ($ ',42 U S. .j 12101 et seq.ï agai t t rc ns t sbiiis t f 99 ( ADA' ) . D e rm e tofSo a Se vi e . Ta ora l g t the ha ( e de e nu e oust ngs' c us of pa t n ci l r c s yl le es ha s d n ni d m r hi ' be a e be hi drug char s ges. He com pl ns t t aft bei l ai ha , er ng ocked up Snum er tm es'and f dnum er f ous i ' or i ous year ' he i bei hel r ponsi e f çback chid s s,' s ng d es bl or s l uppor ;t he i ïbei i cer ed num er f' hat s i ng ncar at ous tme' be a e ofhi tna lt t g taj 't tno o wilhiehi be a e ofShe lwsof i s' c us s t biiy o e ob' ha i ; ne l r m c us s a t gover entagai ts al busi ses' and t he w asdeni t opporuniy t a t t f ralof nm ns m l nes '; hat ed he t t o tend he une hi c l e smot r Ta orsae t thede ls t tg ll ( e rbea et beapatofs it s hidrn' he. yl tts ha s el) ha he'l nlve f bl o r ocey becaus oft e i ues.' e hes ss ' A lhoug he pur r s t b i t s a to unde t ADA , Ta o has no i n ii d a t h po t o r ng hi c i n r he yl r t de tfe ny s ii dia l y t t i t ba i f a ale d di c i i ton by t de e nt h ha no pec fc s bii ha s he s s or ny l ge s rm na i t he f nda , e s t pr oduced any evi dence t he w as ot hat herwi e qualfed t r ve cert n s vi or was excl s ii o ecei ai er ces uded f om em pl ent and he has notaleged t def r oym , l he endants r e i a A DA vi aton. A ccor ngl ' ol n ny ol i di y, t cour fndst Tayl hasf l t s at a cl m upon w hi r i m ay be gr ed and,t ef e, he t i hat or aied o t e ai ch elef ant her or Taylor v. Dept. Social Services dimisst sa to wihoutprj c , s ntt 28U. C.j1 5 b( ) s se hi cin t eudie purua o S. 91 A()1. Doc. 3 , ' - ENTER . . T i // a oAuut21. hs y r gs,03 -,..-'.,'-' . .. . , . zZ , -' ' .. z' U 'ed S esDi ti Judge srct 1On hi Ci lCove Shee , Ta ori c t t tt na l eofhi s ti unde t AD A,s cik al asi r lt s vi r t yl ndiaes ha he tz r s ui s r he pe f ly t eaes t e oym e .Se ECF No.1, tc 1 o mpl nt e Ata h. . Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.