Fry v. New River Valley Regional Jail, No. 7:2013cv00308 - Document 10 (W.D. Va. 2013)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Glen E. Conrad on 07/24/2013. (kab)

Download PDF
el < 8 QF I l, 5lT * Ur . W FX J:. # ! , ATfQASIKk# I II VA FICD L' I TH E U N I N TED STATE S D I STR I C O U R T CT FO R TH E W E STER N D I STR I O F V I G I I CT R N A ROANOKE DI I O N V SI R O BER T D . FRY , ) ) Pl ntf , ai if ) ) ) ) NEW RI VER VALLEY REGI ONAL JAI ) L, ) Dee fndant . ) J 1i 2 1 Ut 23 JULA I BK L Y. . E w *. cksE No. : 3 0 0 7 1 CV: 3 8 M EM O R AN D U M O PI I N N O By: G l n E.C onrad e C hi fU nie St t sD i t c Judge e t d a e s ri t Robe t . y,a V igi a i a e pr ee ng pr K ,t l d t s c vi r g s a ton ptr ua r D Fr r ni nm t oc di o s e hi i l i ht c i zs nt t 4 U. C. 1 8 , le i t a I n me alo fcash v r f s dt p o d hm wi c ran o 2 S. j 9 3 algng h tl a dj i fiil a e eu e o r vie i t e ti n h media i Upon r vi w oft r or t c tfndst tt a ton mus besl a iy c ton. e e he ec d, he our i ha he c i t lmm rl di r s e sni s d. I F y i a imaea t Ne Rie ValyRe in lJ i Ct ej i' . h nh frte tr d r s n n t the w v r le go a al l al' W e e is ne e h ) t ej i, eb o g t d c to fo h me a p r nl s p le t h m tr ug hi Veea ' h al h r u h me iai n r m o , p ae ty u pid o i h o h s tr n s be ft . OnceFr e used t ss y,howe r t medialsa fr f e t pr det ne is y xha t hi uppl ve , he c tf e us d o ovi he me iain b c u eF yrf s dt pa f ri a r q ie b j i p lc F yalg st t eha dc to , e a s r e u e o y o t s e ur d y al oiy. r le e ha h s fldrq e t t s etej i d co a dt rc i me iain, u h sg nef rt we ks ie e u ss o e h al o tr n o e eve dc to b t a o o wo e wihouthi me cne. t s di i F yb i g t i a to a ans t ej i.Asrle, esae ta h wa t t rc iehs r rn s hs cin g i t h al eif h tts h t e n s o e ev i Fry v. New River Valley Regional Jail Doc. 10 medii a t bec cne nd o ompe ae f pan a s f rng. ns td or i nd ufe i 11 The c ti r uie t di m i sa a ton orcl i fl d by a pr s our s eq r d o s s ny c i a m ie i onera ns a gai t gove n en ale iy orofk e i t co tde enni t a ton o c a m i f i ous m alci , r m t ntt t r f he ur t nes he c i r l i s rvol , i ous Dockets.Justia.com RK i # . orfist saeacli onwhihr i ma beg a ed.28U. C.j1 5A( ( ) To saea al o tt am c elef y r nt S. 91 b)1. tt ca eofa tonunde j1 apli ifmus esa iht theha bee de i dofrg s us ci r 983, antf t tbls ha s n prve iht guar nted by t Co tt ton orl oft Unie St esa t ttlsde i to r s t a e he nsiu i aws he td at nd ha ii prva in e uled fo c r m onduc c m it d by a pe s a tng t de col ofs a e l w . W e tv. t ns 487 U . t om te r on c i m r or t t a s A ki s S. 4 ( 9 8 . Th j i, st eo yd fn a t yha n me i t sa to ,sn t G es n' u j c 2 1 8 ) e al a h nl ee d n Fr s a d n hi cin i o a û ro 's b e t p t s i u d r1 1 8 .P e a v Re o 2 3F.d 8 , 0 W L 20 1 a * ( t Ci. a .1 , o ut n e 9 3 r v l . n , 0 3 21 20 0 59 , t 1 4h r J n 3 2 0 )( n u ls e )(uoi W i v. c ia De 'o S aeP lc , 91U. 5 , ( 9 9 0 0 u p bih d q tng l Mih g n pt f tt o ie 4 l S. 8 71 1 8 :; Mc yv Ch s p a çCo r cin l n e s 8 F. p 8 0 8 3 9 ( D. .1 9 )( dng co . e a e k re t a Ce tr 7 8 Su p. 9 , 9 - 4 E. Va 9 2 sn i o ct al mmu efo s i a dn t pes nf rpupo e o j 1 8 ) iyj ii n rm ut n o a ro o r s s f 9 3 . Be a s Fr c nn tp e aln aj1 8 cam a ans t ej i,h c u t imis sFr s c u e y n o rv ii 9 3 li g i t h alt e o r d s se y' c mpan wih u p eu ie p rl n t j1 1 A( )1, slg lyfio o .TheClr i o lit t o t rj dc , u sl t o 9 5 b ( ) a e al rv lus1 n ek s di e t d t s nd co esoft sm e o and t opi on a a om pa ng or rt pl ntf . rce o e pi hi m r lm ni nd cc nyi de o ai if ENTER: Thi s %4 R d a ofJ y,201 y ul 3. Chi fUnie St t D i ti tJ e t d a es sr c udge 1 Thecour al o fndst Fr scur e alegatonsf lt sat aconsiutonaly sgnii t s i hat y' r nt l i ai o t e tt i l i fcant cam a i ta on a teji.Fr do sno i iaeta h h a ysro me c ln e frme c to li gans ny e t h al y e tndc t h t e as n eius dia e d o diain ort th h ss frda yil fet fo n trc i ngi.l as a e r fom hi sbmison t tal ha e a ufee n lefcs rm o e evi t t lo py as r s u si s haj i ofk il a ewiln t pr vi hi wihme iai i hec iswlht ai' me c lu tp o e r s t as r lig o o de m t dc ton f omple t hej ls dia ni r c du e . Se Esel v. mbl, 29U. 9 1 2( 9 )(idigt tp ion rmus s w d i rt i if rnc e t le Ga e 4 S. 7, 0 1 76 fn n ha rs e t ho el ae nd fee e be t hi s'o me ia n e t p o c tt ton vilto me en glg nc i no s fce ) W rg tv. o s e ius dc l e d o r ve onsiu i al oain; r e ie e s t ufiint; ih r Colns 7 F.d 8 ,8 ( h Ci.1 )(idigmeedia r e ntb t e i t a d me c l li , 66 2 41 49 4t r 985 fn n r s g e me e we n nmae n dia pe s nn lo rc reo te t n d sn i iaec tt ton lrg t) r o e ve ou s f rame t oe ot mplc t onsiu i a ih s. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.