Anderson v. Directors of VDOC, No. 7:2013cv00280 - Document 7 (W.D. Va. 2013)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Samuel G. Wilson on 6/25/2013. (tvt)

Download PDF
e' eapRKs OFFI U. Dl cOUr CE 8. Sm ATRoANEJ V FLoyE,A I( l . I THE UNI STATESDI TRI COURT N TED S CT J 25 2 1 UN 03 FOR THE W ESTERN DI STRI O F VI CT RGI A JULI C,'.' NI A BY; ROANO KE DI SI VI ON CL D W I AM LEE ANDERSON, l LLI l, Ci lAc i No.7: vi ton 136+ 00280 Pe i i r t tone , M EM OR ANDUM O PI ON NI V. DI ECT O R S O F VD O C, R R e ponde . s nt By:Sam ue G .W is l l on Uni e St e Di t i tJudge t d at s s r c Th si ap tto f rawrto h b a c r uspls a t o2 U. C. 2 4b W iln Le i s eiin o i f a e s op t u n t 8 S. j 25 y l m e r i Ande s I , Vigi a i t pr e ng p oK ,c le nghi 2009r bbe y a obsr c i r on, 1 a r ni nma e oce di r ha lngi s o r nd t u ton o j siec n cin i W ah n tnCo nyCic i Co r.Th c u t idstepeiint be f u tc o vito n s i go u t r ut u t e o r fn h tt o o s c e sv a d s se ip ru n t 2 U. C. 2 4 49. u c si e nd imis s t u s a t o 8 S. j 2 4 1 : And ro p e iu l fldaj2 4peiinc n e n t saec u tu g n he es n r vo sy ie 25 tto o c mig he tt o rj d me t c l nge he e, he c tdim i s d i a untm e y,s e A nde s v. ie or VD OC, o. hale s r t our s s e t s i l e r on D r ct . N 7:2 v 2 ( . Va Au u t8 2 1 ) An es na p ae al t eCo r o Ap asds se 1 c 3 3 W D. . g s , 0 2 , d ro p e ld, r h u t f pe l imisd d h sa pe l S eAn e s nv. r do , .1 - 5 ( t Ci. c 2 , 01 ) i p a. e d ro Die r No 2 7 61 4h r De . 7 2 2 . Pt s n t j2 4 *) afd rldsrc c u t yc n i e as c n o s c siej2 5 l ua t o 2 4 , e e a itit o r ma o sd r e o d r uc e sv 2 4 r pe ii onl i pe ii rs c ess c fc c tt a i fom t Unie St t s Cour ofAppe s tton y f ttone e ur pe ii erik ton r he t d a e t al f r is crut t t t cams i t e p tto me t c ran ciei. j2 4 ( )3 . Be a e o t ic i ha he li n h ei n e eti rtra i 2 4b() c us Ande s n hasnotde ro monsr t d t the ha ob ane t r quie c riiato a au horzai n ta e ha s t i d he e r d e tfc i n nd t i to Anderson v. Directors of VDOC Doc. 7 by t Cour of Appea s f t Fourh Cic t t c twil dimis t peii wihou he t l or he t r ui, he our l s s he tton t t prj c a s ce sve.Ana opraeor wile e t sda eudie s uc s i ppr it der l ntr hi y. 1The cour alo deni Ander on' f l i m otonsasmoot moton f l t s es s s olow ng i : i or eave t pr ee i o oc d n fr o mapa pe i ( No. ) mo in f he rng( No. ; to t a oi c uns l ECF No. ) u rs ECF 2 ; to or ai ECF 4) moin o pp nt o e ( 5; and m i elaneous( oton t I por t Af sc l K i o ncor a e fdavi f Ofi alRecor Pur uantt New Excul or M t or fci d s o pat y Maeil d nc ç anlj y' ( No. ) tra Evie e Bri nur ' ECF 6. ' Dockets.Justia.com Ju. / . ! . ENTER: Thi .da ofJ ,201 y une 3. ' 'r I TED STA TES D l sTm c' J J GE r ID

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.