Washington v. Health Care Providers for VA. Dept. of Corrections et al, No. 7:2013cv00276 - Document 11 (W.D. Va. 2013)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Samuel G. Wilson on 7/23/2013. (tvt)

Download PDF
elFpm OFFI U. DI COUX CE S. SQ AT ROANOKE,V A FI. D t E JUL 23 2 1 23 I TH E U N I N TED STATE S D I STR I C O U RT CT W EST ER N D I STR I T O F V I G I I C R N A R O AN O K E D W ISIO N ) ) ) V. ) ) HEALTH CARE PROVI DERSFOR ) VA. DEPT.OF CORRECTI ONS,e a. ) t I, Dee a s fnd nt. ) JULA G. I D BY: DE THEODORE W ASHI NGTON Pl ntf , ai if Ci lA c i N o.7: 3: 276 vi t on 1 v00 M EM OM NDUM O PI ON NI By:Sam ue G .W is l l on Uni e St e D i t i tJudge t d at s s r c The eW a hi o aVigi ai aepr e ng pr K ,brngst saci purua t odor s ngtn, r ni nm t oc edi o i hi ton s nt o . 42U. C.j 1 a i tt pe iidheat c r pr desf t Vigi aDe rme tof S. 983 gans ms cfe lh ae ovi r or he r ni pa t n Core i Cç rctons VDOC',W ade Car M a s Die t Haol Cl ke, t VDOC. ' r n l ni, rcor r d ar and he ) W a hi on ca mst tde enda sde e hi a uaem e ca te t ntf hi ha The s ngt li ha f nt ni d m deq t di l r a me or s nd. co tfndst tW a hi on' c pl ntf ist sa eapl usbl c am t r le ,a t r f e, ur i ha s ngt s om ai a l o tt a i e l i o e if nd, he e or d s s e hi a to wi o tp eudc p ru n t 28U. C. 1 5 b ( ) imis s s cin t u rj ie u s a t o h S. j 91 A( )1 . Ata1tm e pe tne t t slws t W a hi on wa hous a Powhaa Co r c i l 1 i s ri nt o hi a ui, s ngt s ed t tn r e tona Ce tr(po aaf) rGr e r c Cor ci n lCe tr(Gr eto k'.W a h n tncamsta ne C wh tl'o e n o k re to a ne ç e r c ' t t r ) s i go li h t a uni ntfe s ge t d hi hemus ha s ge y t r parda a t hi rghthandby no n de ii d ur on ol m t ve ur r o e i m ge o s i l trt n M a ch 2,201 Begnni Fe u r 22,201 W as ngtn al gesher pe t y ae ha r 2. i ng br a y 2, hi o le e aedl i or e t medialsaf a Powhaa a t n upon hi ta f r atGr enr k,a nf m d he c tft tn, nd he s r nse , e oc bouthi s co to a ne f s r r W as ngt a l st t des t hi ef ors t m e ca s af a ndii n nd ed or u ge y. hi on lege ha , pie s f t , he di l t f t Washington v. Health Care Providers for VA. Dept. of Corrections et al Doc. 11 Powha a a Gr e oc de e hi t ne es a y ha s ge y.W as ngt cai st tt t n nd e nr k nid m he c s r nd ur r hi on l m ha he delbe a e i f e e ofm edi la he lh c r pr de sw ihi t V D O C ha ca e i r t ndi f r nce ca nd a t a e ovi r t n he ve us d û ema ntirve sbl dn ge.'( ( r ne ,re ri e ma ' Comp.6,ECFNo.1. W ahi onalosaest tt P ) s ngt s tt ha he ti tt i ldoc or' tG r e ock r f s d t pr de hi w ih pai m edi a i H oweve , sns iutona t ' a e nr e u e o ovi m t n c ton. r Dockets.Justia.com L W as ng on doesnots ik a l i ntf a oft doc or o o he heat c r pr vi r he hi t pect ly de iy ny he t s r t r lh a e o de s cli de e hi a uaem e c lte t nt a ms ni d m deq t di a r a me . l o de t saeac us ofa o u d rj1 3, a hn tnmus alg f dsid c tn n r r o tt a e din n e 98 W s igo t le e a n iaig t theha be n de i ofrght gua a e d by t Consiuto orl wso t Unied St t ha s e prved i s r nt e he tt i n a f he t aes a t tt sde i ton r ule fom c nd ha hi prva i es t d r onduc c t omm it d by ape s a ngunde c o ofsae te r on di r ol r t t lw.W e t At is 4 7U. 4 1 8 ) W ahigtnh sfie t saeacam a an t a s v. kn , 8 S. 2( 9 8 . s n o a ald o tt li g is de e ntû lh c r pr de sf t V DO C' bec us us oft t r i a t c r pr vi r ,' f nda d t a e ovi r or he hea ' a e e he e m ç lh a e o de s ' he wihoutt na i ofs cik he lh c r pr de s i nota qua et sa eac am a i ta t he m ng pe f at a e ovi r , s de t o t t l i ga ns ' ron'asrquie i j 1 a tons Se W ilv.Mihi n De tQfStt Polce 491U. 58 t s ' e rd n 983 ci . e l pe c ca p' ae i , S. (98 ) Th rf r ,h c u t l d s s h at c r p o i esfrt VDOC a ap ry 1 9 . ee o e te o r wil imis e l ae r v d r o he h s at def nda i t s c s .1 e nt n hi a e 11 l f t ra a st tW a hi on i s ng W a den M ani a Ha ol Cl r s el t urhe ppe r ha s ngt s ui r s nd r d a ke ol y bec us oft i s vior posto .A medialteam e cli c nno bebr a e her uper s y ii ns c r t nt am n t oughta i ta gans s r iorabs ta al ga i t the waspe s l c upe v s en n le ton ha r onaly onnec e wih t de a oft media t d t he ni l he cl te t nt2 V i dze v Gi ,550F. 926 ( h Ci.1977 .Tode taes pe vs y r ame . nne bbs 2d 4t r ) monsrt u r ior . l i ial, steVDOC i n tat esn'u j c t s t nd rj1 8 , s n tnc n o mananhs Sm lry a h s o s ro 'sbe to uiu e 9 3 Wahigo a n t iti i p a to a an thsd fnd n.S eWil4 U. a 6 ; co v Ch sp a eCorCt.7 2F. u p. 9 ( D. cin g is ti ee a t e l 91 S.t 8 Mc y . e a e k r. T, 8 S p 8 0 E. , Va 1 9 ) . 9 2. 2TheEi hAmendme ' pr bii o c ela t ua pt s ntpr e t p ione sfom t ght nts ohi ton n ru nd mus l mihme otc s rs r r he ( ce s r a wanoni lci ofpai 'whih i l ( i r t i feenc t s i me ca nee .'Se E unne s a y nd t nfiton n, c ncudes t be ae ndif r e o erous di l ds' e ' del Esel v Ga e 4 9U. 9 ,1 4( 9 6 .Tosc e do a Eih Ame me t me-n -n s a-uns me t tl . mbl, 2 S. 7 0 1 7 ) u c e n n g t nd n c la du u u l ih n e p cam, p io e mus po et t n s E 1 ta obe tv l ted piaino ab sch ma n e wa li a rsn r t rv wo hig :< ) h t j ciey h e rv to f a i u n e d s ( ûufiinl sro s' n ( )t t u jci l tep io of casatdwi aduf e t c p bl saeo mid.' s fce ty eiu ya d 2 ha s be t y h rs n t il ce t s fkinl ula e tt f n ' ve i h y ' J h s nv. io s 1 5F.d1 4, 6 (t Ci. 99 )( u tn Wisnv. ie, 01U. 2 4, 8(9 ). e o n o Oun ne, 4 3 6 1 7 4h r 1 8 q oig lo Setr 5 S. 9 29 1 91) Th o j ciec mpo e ti stsidb p o igasro me ia c ndto .L .Th sbe tv c mpo e tsstsi d be t o n n s aite y r vn eius dc l o i n 4 e u jcie o n n i aite v i b s o ngap io o t ilsdei r t id fe e c .L .M e en g i e c d e no c n t ed l e ae y h wi rs n f a ' l a e n ifr n e 4 r e lg n e o s t o si e i r t k be mt b i fe e e;r her aprs ofkilmus bo. bea r oft fc sfo whih t i eenc coul bedr t ta ndifr nc at , ion t a t t h wa e he a t r m c he nf r e d awn ha s b tn il ik o h r e ss a h mu tas d a t ei e e c .L . s eas F r rv. e n n 51 U. 8 5 u sa ta rs f a m xit, nd e s lo rw h nfr n e 4 ; e lo a me Br n a , 1 S. 2 , 8 7(99 ) tr etbihta ah at c r p o ie' a t nsc n tmt d l eaeidfee et asro sme ia 3 1 4 . io sa l h t e lh ae r vd rs ci o si e ei rt n ifrnc o eiu dc l ' s o b nee t teamentmus bes g os l i ompe e ,i quat,ore svea t s k t c ce eort bc d, he r t t o r sy nc t nt nade e xcesi s o hoc he ons inc o la ii , panif s s o t t ( )tes p r io ha a t l rc n tu tv k o e et a iblt a li t mu t h w ha: 1 h u e vs r d cua o o sr cie n wldg h t y f hi s di t wa e s ubor na e s ngage i conduc t tpos d ape v svea t ea ona ers o dn t ha e r a i nd mr s bl ik f c n ttto ln u yt ctz nss c a t panif ( ) h s p r io ' r s o et t e o siuina ij r o i e u h s he li t ; 2 t e u e vs rs e p ns o h i f knowldgewass i qua east s e o nade t o how de i r t i fe enc t o t i a horzai oft lbe a e ndif r e o r act ut i ton he al dofe i prci ;a ( t r wa a afr tveca a lnkbewe nt s r iors lege fnsve a tces nd 3) hee s n fimai us li t e he upe vs ' ia to a dtepatc lrc n tt to l nu ys frdb t panif S eS w v Sr u ,1 n cin n h riu a o siuina ij r ufee y he litf. e ha . to d 3 F. 791, ( h Ci.1 .Hee,W as ngt fist s t tW ade M a sandDieco 3d 799 4t r 994) r hi on al o how ha r n ni r tr Cl r w e e pe s l i ve i hi tea m e . Ther f e, he c ' di m i s s t c a m s a ke r r onaly nvol d n s r t nt e or t oul s s e he l i t a ans t e ed fn a t fo ti s i p rua t o2 U. C. 1 5 b ( ) g i t h s e e d n s rm h s ut u s n t 8 S. j 91 A( )1. 1 11. l a cor ncewih t memor nd o ni e t r d ont sday, hec tdimis n c da t he a um pi on n e e hi t our s s es W a hn o ' c mp an wih u p eu ie s igtn s o lit t o t rj d c . The Clr oft Cour i die e t s c esoft sme or ndlm o ni a t e k he t s r ctd o end opi hi m a l pi on nd he a com pa i or rt t pa te . c ny ng de o he r i s ETRTi3laoJl21. NE:hzfdyfu,03 s y Ud e sae DititJ d e d tt s src u g it ea et fn a n a fin s. Mite v Be r,8 F.d8 , 5l(t Ci. 9 0 (iigRogr v. n , nolrbl o u d me tl ar e s' lir . on 96 2 48 8 4h r 1 9 ) ctn ' es Eva s 7 2F.d1 5 ,1 8( 1hCi.l 8 ) l ti rs e tterg tt me ia te t n i l tdt ta te t n ta 9 2 0 2 05 1 t r 9 6). n hs ep c,h ih o dc lrame ts i e o h trame th t mi i me cal nec s r a no t tha whi ma bec i r meel desr e' Bowrng v.Godwi 551F. s di ly esa y nd t o s t ch y onsde ed r y iablx' t i n, 2d 4 , (t Ci. 9 7 . 4 48 4h r 1 7 ) 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.