Beckham v. Roanoke City Police Department K9 et al, No. 7:2013cv00133 - Document 20 (W.D. Va. 2013)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Jackson L. Kiser on 7/9/2013. (tvt)

Download PDF
CLERK' OF CE u. Dl COur S FI s. Sm ATDANVI vA LLE. FL D+ /m u I E J 2! 2 1 UL 23 I THE UNI S N TED TATESDI TRI COURT S CT FOR TH E W ESTERN DI STRI OF VI CT RGI A NI RO AN O K E DI I O N V SI 2 c. DL c uL c BY: DEPm Y CLERK A N TO N I DW A YN E B ECK H A M , O Pl ntf ai if, V. R O A N O K E CI PO LI E TY C D EPA R TM EN T K 9,etal, . D efendant s. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Ci lA c i N o.7: 3- v- 33 vi ton 1 c 001 M EM O R AN D U M O PI O N NI By: H on.Jacks L.K i on ser Se or Uni e St esD i t i tJudge ni t d at src Ant ni Dway Be o o ne ckha ,aVigi aprs rpr e di pr s ,fld aci lrght m r ni ione oc e ng o e ie vi i s a to pzs a tt 42U.. j1 3wi jzid cinvetdi 2 U.. j1 4 Plitf ci n l u n o r SC. 98 t l s ito se n 8 SC. 3 3. an if h r nnme a de enda st Roa s s f nt he noke Ciy Polc De rm e K9;Se g ntR. . ndlr t K9' t ie pa t nt r ea A Cha e , he s ha e ;a O f i e Ra lCox. On M a 31 201 de e nt f l d a m oton t dim i s f r ndl r nd fc r ndal y , 3, f nda s ie i o s s o f ii t sae acli upon whih r le may begr nt d.On J ne3,201 t Clr is ed a a lng o t t am c ei f a e u 3,he e k s u Notc t ad s d pl ntf t tam o i t dimi swa tl o M ay 31 201 a t t i e hat vie ai if ha ton o s s s ied n , 3, nd ha pli ifha t y- da fo t N o i t fl a r s antf d went one ys r m he tce o ie e pons . TheNotc f rhe a s d: e ie u t r dvie l Plitf d e n t e p n t Dee d n ': (ij e d n s t eCo r wi f anif o s o r s o d o fn a ts1 sc pla i g ,h u t l 1 l as t t tPli ifha l ti e es i t ca e a ort tPli ifag e wih sune ha antf s os nt r t n he s , nd/ ha antf r es t wha t Dee ntsaesi t i (ijr ponsvepladi s.l Pli ifwihe t he fnda tt n her sc es i e ngt) f antf s s t c i wih t c e i i ne s a y t tPl i ifr s o ontnue t he as , t s ce s r ha antf e pond i a a oprae n n ppr i t f s on....Howe r i Pl ntf doe notfl s a hi ve s f ai if s ie omer po e wihi t t nt es ns t n he we y- one ( )da pe i t Cou tmav dimist c s f f lzet pr e ut 21 v rod. he r s s he a e or aitr o os c e. Noi ( no.1 ( i nale tce ECF 8) orgi mphai) ss. Pl i if di notr po t t N otc o t m o i n t di m i s and t N otc w a not a ntf d es nd o he i e z he t o o s s , he i e s Beckham v. Roanoke City Police Department K9 et al Doc. 20 r t ne t t co ta undelve a e. Pur ua t t c tsJ m e 3, e ur d o he ur s i r bl s nt o he our ' t 2013, otc ltnd t t N i e, i ha pl ntf ha l ti e es i pr e utng t sc e.Ac r ngl t sa ton i d s s e wiho ai if s os nt r t n os c i hi as co di y, hi c i s i mis d t ut p eudc frplitf sfil et p o e u e pls a t oFe R. v. 41b , ndd fn a t ' rj ie o an if alr o r s c t, t u n t d. Ci P. ( ) a ee d n s z r 11no e t ta 1t ee de e nt fl d t m oton t dim i s t ha l hr f nda s ie he i o s s . Dockets.Justia.com m oton t dimi si dim is a m oot SeeLi v.W a h R. Co. 370 U. 626,630i o s s s s s ed s . nk bas R. , S. 31 ( 96 (t a hort ofaco tt dimiss s nt f lc ofpr ec to ha ge r lybee 1 2) <The ut iy ur o s s ua po e or a k os uin s ne al n c i r d an ûnhe e powe , ... c s rl vese i co t t mana t i o afar s a onsde e i r nt r' ne es a iy t d n urs o ge her wn f is o s t a hivet or ry a e dii dipostonofc es' . o c e he de l nd xpe tous s ii as .) ' TheClr i die t t s nd c e oft sM e or ndum Opi on a t ac ompa ng e k s r c ed o e opi s hi m a ni nd he c nyi Or rt t pa tes de o he ri . EN TER :Thi qY s dyo Jl, 2013. a f uy u. e rUnied St t sDititJ e ni t a e src udg

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.