Ingram v. Clark et al, No. 7:2013cv00091 - Document 10 (W.D. Va. 2013)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Glen E. Conrad on 04/12/2013. (kab)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
et : oFFl u, . sm cotr mv cE s nl l A R 1rkr ,A T 9 ''u v ),r ) ' n .( . r I THE UNI STATESDI TRI COURT N TED S CT AP 12 2 j j gJ FO R T H E W ESTERN D I STR I T O F VI G I A C R NI R O AN O K E DIV ISIO N JUQi , .y ' ERK l sx A C.i' t 2fcu , . . DEP JA M ES R AN DO LPH I G R AM , N Pl ntf ai if, LERK C i lA c i n N o.7: c 00091 vi t o 13- vM EM O M ND U M O PI O N NI V. CL AR K ,ET A L, By: Chi fJudge G l n E.C onrad e e Chi fU nied St e D i t i Judge e t at s s r ct Dee n t) fnda ts. J m esR a ph I a ,pr ee ng pr K , ie a c vi r g scom pl i , s ntt 42 n ndol ngr m oc di o f l d i l i ht a nt pur ua o U. C.j 1 .By Or re ee 3/ / 3,t c tdiecedpl nift s twihi 1 S. 983 de ntr d 20201 he our r t aitf o ubmi t n 0 da f om t da e oft Or r a i a e a ountf za a c ri d copy ofhi t u tf ys r he t he de n nm t cc ona nd e tfe s r s und a ountsa e e f t sx- ont pe i pr c ng t flng oft com pl i . Pl i ifwas cc t t m nt or he i m h r od e edi he ii he a nt a ntf a vie ta af ilet c mpywo dr s l i d s sa o ti a to wih u p eu ie d s d h t alr o o l ul e ut n imisl f h s cin t o t rj dc . t M or t n 1 da ha ea ed,a pl n ifhasf ie t co pl wih t de c i d e ha 0 ys ve lps nd aitf al d o m y t he s rbe c tonsbec us t s i t r quese fnanc a doc e a i Ac di y, hec t ondii a e o ubm t he e t d i i l um ntton. cor ngl t our d s se t ea to wi u p eu iea dsrk st ec s fo tea tv d c e o t ec u t imis s h cin t t rj dc n tie h a e r m h cie o k t f h o r. ho Pl n ifm a r iet cli i a s par t a ton onc pli ifi pr pa e t c aitf y efl he a ms n e ae c i e antf s e r d o ompl wih t y t he not c tons ed ondii . The Cl r i die t d t s nd a c oft s M e or ndum Opi on a ac m pa ng ek s rce o e opy hi m a ni nd co nyi Or t pl i if der o antf rs h EN TER : ' i t M dyo- rl2 1 . 1 a t i 03 Ap , Chi fUnie St t D i ti tJ e t d a es s r c udge
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
