Garcia v. Hinkle, et al, No. 7:2013cv00080 - Document 8 (W.D. Va. 2013)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Samuel G. Wilson on 7/22/2013. (tvt)

Download PDF
elO - :FF4 U . pl e@ue eE R A R A i Lv T O N K ,A FI LED JUL 22 2 1 93 I TH E UN I N TED STA TES DI RI CO U R T ST CT FO R TH E W E STER N D I STRI T O F V I I I C RG N A R O A N O K E D I SI N VI O ' J A ' r ''& # ULI * ' CLERK BY; D JOHNNY L.GARCI A, Pl i if a nt f , C as No.7: 3- ve 1 c 00080 V. M EM OM NDUM OPI ON NI GEORGE H I NKLE e/al, . Def endant s. By: Sam uelG . is W lon U nie St t D i t c Judge t d a es s ri t Pli ifJ antf ohnny L. r a, Vigi a i t pr e ngrr s brngstlscvi rg s Ga ci a r ni nma e oce di o e, i li i l i ht a tonptrua t 42U. C.j 1 algi t tofiil a t saeprs vi aedhi ci ts nt o S. 983, le ng ha fcas t wo tt ions olt s c tm tona rg s Am ong ma o he t ngs Ga ci al ge t taprs e pl onsi i l iht . ny t r hi , r a le s ha ion m oyeet a ld t i ie o f d he j b'o ta fri ghm t ad fee t rs n ta s me n t o hsj u n l atrp io o r o ' f rnsern i o ifrn p io ,h t o o e o k i o r as fe rs n sa fpl edhi i s ia y c i t f ac m n oltr onfneme , ha t di cplna y boa d wr uly s pende hi nt t t he s i i r r ongf l us d s viiai n prvie sa trfndi hi guit ofc pii t s k t c i o t prs a st to i lge fe i ng m ly ons rng o nea obac o nt he ion, nd t tva i prs empl sdie t d r caly i e ii lnguagea hi . ha rous ion oyee r c e a i l ns nstve a t m Unde 28U. C.j191 A, src c t aerquiedt rviw prs rc ansfr r S. 5 ditit ours r e r o e e ione omplit o c ompla ewiht bascr l sofpladi a i doi s t co tmus et rtde iy inc t he i u e e ng, nd n ng o, he ur t ihe t ntf i c z bl cli so dim ist co pl nt ora po ton oft c ogni a e am r s s he m ai , ny ri he ompli ,i t co ait... a nt f he mpl n fist saeacam u o wh c r le ma b g a td' 1 5 b .A c mplitmu t le e al o tt li p n ih eif y e rn e . 91 A( ) o an s alg 'j G t enough f c st sa eacli t r i t ti plusbl on isf e. a r t no v. ol on,521 a t o tt a m o elef ha s a i e t ac ' 'Gira a J ms F.d2 8 3 2( t Ci. 0 8 ( u t Bel l Co p v Two l 5 0U. 5 4 5 0( 0 7 3 9 , 0 4h r 2 0 ) n oi nM lAt. r . . mby, 5 S. 4 , 7 2 0 :. Garcia v. Hinkle, et al Doc. 8 The f mii nze ofpl di ar gr tyr lxed f pr s pli tfs howe r a ltga s a lar ls ea ng e eal ea oï o e a n if , ve , nd ii nt wih m e iorousc am ss dnotbesymi d by t l ca r uie e s Se Be ude t Ciy t rt i l i houl t e ecmi l eq r m nt . e a t v. t o Ha t n 7 5F.d 1 7 ,1 7 - 8(t Ci.1 8 ) S ilt er lx to o t epe dngr ls f mp o , 7 2 2 4 2 7 7 4h r 9 5 . tl,h ea ain f h la i ue i notwihoutlm is.A c t t a ami mum , a et dic m fom t c s t i t our mus, t ni be bl o s e r he ompli t ant he Dockets.Justia.com pari bei s d a t alege co tes ng ue nd he l d nduc on whih e c ca m r t .Thoug r l d,t t c a h li ess h eaxe he sa d r sil e n g nea c h rnc , ndid e n t e ur c u t Goc nt eu q sins tn ad tld ma ds e rl o ee e a t o s o r q ie o rs t o jl p ueto t r ne rs r l pr e e t t m .'I a 1 ve qua ey es nt d o he ' d. t 278. I Ga c aha vi econsi i c am s t y a ewel cn f r i s abl tmtonal l i , he r l moufa d wihi hi 5000l ge t n s wor compl nta t nume ousdoc e sheha a t he t i. l ispr s ntf r ,Ga ca' d ai nd he r um nt s tac d o t n t e e o m ri s c ompli c it ofdoze oft nge ily r l t d a do esi vi doze ofi vi l ant onss s ns a nta l e a e nec t nvol ng ns ndi dua s wih quesi bl r l tons pst a dice i ec tt i lvi a i .W hiet pl di t tona e e ai hi o ny s m bl onsiutona oltons l he ea ng nzesdo noti l mpos a exaci sa r on Ga c a a whiet c ti s iiousofa e n tng t nda d r i , nd l he our s olct ny l ii ae c tt i na cli hehas hemus ofe ar a i y sr i htor r sa e tofhi egtm t onsiuto l a ms , t f r eltvel ta g f wa d t t men s camso whc t ed fn a t c nb s a a s ro o whiht ec u t a b s aj d me t li n ih h e e d n s a a e n n we r n c h o r c n a e u g n . Ac o dngy t ec ur d s se Gacasc mpan wi o tp eudc frf izet saea c r i l,h o t imis s r i' o li t t u rj ie o alr o tt h t c am . li . ... 7 r A .' s EN TER :J y 22,201 ul 3. 6 A . . rZ ë . . ' UNI TED STA TES D I STRI JUD GE CT 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.