Awe v. Virginia Department Of Corrections et al, No. 7:2012cv00546 - Document 39 (W.D. Va. 2013)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Jackson L. Kiser on 7/12/2013. (tvt)

Download PDF
cktnK' oF cEu. . s couRT s Fl s DlT. A nFVIL y T AN L E, A IN TH E U N I TED STATE S D ISTR ICT C O U R T FO R TH E W ESTERN D I STR I O F VI G I A CT R NI l DG r( L E kko J 12 2 1 UL 23 BJ . DE C TK YU D t' L : x ROANOK E DI SI VI ON K E NN ETH V AL EN TIN E AW E , Pl ntf , ai if DEPUW CL ERK Ci lA ct on N o.7: cvvi i 12- 00546 M EM O M ND U M O PI O N NI V I G I A D EPTA RT M EN T O F R NI C O R R ECTI N S,e al, O t . D ef endants . By: H on. ks L.K i e Jac on sr Se or U ni e St t sD i t i tJudge ni t d a e src Ke t V ae i Awe aVigi a i t pr e ngpr K ,fl d acvi rght nne h lntne , r ni nma e oce di o ie i l i s Co an pt s a tt 4 U.. j1 8 wi t idcinv se i 2 U. C. 1 43 P an if mplit t u n o 2 SC. 9 3 t l s ito e td n 8 S. j 3 . litf r hj r nn st Vigi aDe t ntofCore tons(t me he r ni parme rci C VDOC' a f l ofise oye as ' nd otr t mpl es ) dee n s Thi matri bef emef rsr e ng, rua t 28U. C.j 1 5a j1 5A. fnda t. s te s or o c e ni pu s nt o S. 91 nd 91 Ahe r vi wi pl i ifss isons Idim ist cli sa i tt VDOC andt nni t i r e e ng antf ubm s i , s s he am gans he e na e t asa def nt enda . Imus dim isany a ton orcli fl d by a i m a ei lde e m i t tt aci o t s s ci am ie n n t f t r ne ha he ton r cli i fi ousorf ist sa eacl m on whih r le ma begr nt d. Se 28U . C. am s rvol a l o tt ai c ei f y a e e S. jj1 5()2) 1 A( ( ) 42U. C.j1 () Thetrtsa r i l cli ba e 91 e( , 915 b)1 ; S. 997ec . is tndad ncudes ams s d upon E n i s a y m e il slgalt y,'é am sofi rngeme ofal li e e twhih û ndiputbl rtes e heor 't i a cl nfi nt ega ntr s c c e ry d note s ' c am swhe et tf c ua c nt ntonsa ecl ry bas l s . N et kev. l a l oes xit'or l i r he ta t l o e i r ea l e e s' iz ' W iln , 9 U. 3 9 3 7(98 ) esc ndsa d r i t efmi a sa d r f ramoint l ms 4 0 S. 1 , 2 1 9 .Th e o tn ad s h a l r tn a d o i i to o dimisunde Fe r lRul ofCi lPr edze 1 b)6) a ce i apli ifsfcua alegai s s r de a e vi oc tr 2( ( , c ptng antf a t l l tons Awe v. Virginia Department Of Corrections et al Doc. 39 a t e.A c s nz ompli ne t s tandpli sa e ntoft cl m s ant eds t hor a an t t me he ai howi t tt pl de i ng ha he ea r s e tte t rle ' n s fiin Sta t a alg to . .or iearg tt r le a o et e n i d o eif a d u fce té l cu l le ains . t as ih o eif b v h l g s c ai lve .... BelAt. p. Twombl 550U. 5 555( pe ultve e l ' l lCor v. ' y, S. 44, 2007)(ntm a ie l quottonmar omitd) pl ntf sbassf r le Ceq rsmor t n lbel a ai ks te .A ai if i or eif û uie r e ha a s nd Dockets.Justia.com c uso .... 1 The ef e apli ifmus ç le f t s fcintt sa ea 1t ee e s oncl i ns ' d. r or , antf ' t ç lge ac s ufi e o t t 1 he lm nt a of(helcai ' Basv. IDupontdeNe s& Co.324F. 761 765( h Ci.2003) t l m. s E.. ' mour , 3d , 4t r . De e mi ng whehe acompl ntsaesaplusbl cai f r i i ç contxts c fc t r ni t r ai t t a i e l m or elef s d a e - pe ii t s ta rq ie t erviwigc ur t d a o isj d ca e p re c a dc mmo sn e' a k h t e ur s h e e n o t o r w n t u iil x e in e n o n e s . ' As r t l ,556U. 662,678- ( hcof v.qbal S. 79 2009) Thus ac ts e ni acompl ntt rRul . , our cre ng ai mde e 1 b ()c nie tf p e dn st a aen te t ldt a a s mp ino tuhb c u ete 2()6 a d niy la ig h t r o ni e o n su to f r t e a s h y t conss ofnomor t nlbesa c l ins Jl Alho h Ilbe al c tu apr K it e ha a l nd oncuso . -s t ug i r ly onsr e o t c mpan, i e v. r e, 0 U. 51 , 20 21( 9 2 , d no a ta a imaesa v c t, o litHan s Ke n r 4 4 S. 9 5 - 1 7 ) l o t c s n n t ' d o ae s s e de l pi saut y a co tt i c am snotcea l r s d i ac ua pont ve o ng t t or nd nsiutonal l i l zy aie n ompl i . Se ant e Br kv. rol,1 7F. 241 243( hCi.1 ( tg, , ncuni ;Be ude t Civof oc Car l 0 3d , 4t r 997) Luti J.co ngl a t v. t Ha t n 7 5F. 1 4,1 7 (t Ci.1 8 ) S eas Go d nv Le k , 7 F.d 1 4 ,1 5 mp o , 7 2d 27 2 8 4h r 9 5 . e lo r o . e e 5 4 2 1 7 1 1 ( h Ci.1 (e ogni ngt tadititcouti note ce t as met r eofa cae 4t r 978) r c zi ha src t' s xpe td o ml he ol dvo t f a pr K or o . p an ig. litf To saeacam u d rj1 3 ap an ifmus alg ihevo ai no arg ts c r db tt li n e 98 , litf t l e t ilto f ih e u e y e t t Consiu i n a lwsoft Unie St t s a mus s he tt to nd a he t d a e , nd t how t tt al ge de i ton wa ha he le d prva i s c mmitdb apes n a tn t e c lro saelm ' W e tv At n , 8 U. 4 48(98 ) o te y ro cig md r oo f tt a ' s . kis 4 7 S. 2, 1 8 . Th VDOC, sad p rme to teCo n at o Vign a i n tat es n' u j c t a e a e a t n f h mmo we lh f r ii,s o s ro 's be t o p j1 3a ton.Se W ilv. ihi nDe tofStt Polce 491U. 58, (989 (ttngt t 98 ci e l M c ca p' ae i , S. 70 1 ) sai ha sa e a gove n e t e iist ta eco i r n msoft sae a enotC r ons' t t s nd r m n al ntte ha r nsde ed r he tt r û s 'unde pe r j1 8 ) Ac o dngy pan if e e tyfist saeacam u o whc r le ma beg a td 9 3 . c r i l , litf prs n l al o tt li p n ih eif y rn e a i tt VDOC, ndt VDOC i t r i t d asa d e nt Pl i ifsc am sagans t ga ns he a he s e m na e ef nda . antf l i i t he f z VD O C e pl esr a nspe ng. otr m oye em i ndi The Cl r i die t t s nd co e oft sM e o a e k s r ced o e pis hi m r ndum Opi on a t a ompa ng ni nd he cc nyi Or rt t pa te . de o he ri s EN TER : s Thi AH da ofJ y, 3. y ul 201 f ni Unie St t sDititJ e o t d a e src udg

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.