Warren v. Tri Tech Laboratories, Inc., No. 6:2012cv00046 - Document 24 (W.D. Va. 2013)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Norman K. Moon on May 2, 2013. (sfc)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
p px0 om a AL T- I THE U NI STATESD I N TED STRI C OURT CT FoR THE W ESTERN D I CT OFV I NI STRI RGI A LYNCHBURG D I SI VI ON ua nlk couv a b qv i h FI LED G Y 12 2 1 23 J B: . DUDL DEP CLERK RK CI L A CT ON N O.6: 2- 00046 VI I 1 cv- D AVI W ARREN, D Pl n% ait M EM O RAN D UM O PN ON V. TRITECH LABORATORI I , ES, NC. De ndant fe . N ORM AN K . OON M U NI STATES DI TRI J TED S CT UDGE By c ouns ,De e ntfl d a m oto t dim i s t pr s Pl i if s Til V I c pl i el f nda ie i n o s s he o e a ntf te I om a nt a i i y unde 42 U. C.j 2000e- 9()be a e he fie t fl hi Compli wihi s < mel unt r S. 5( 1 c us ald o ie s ant t n ni t ( da atrr eptoft Equa Empl ntOpport t Commison' (< ney 90) ys fe ec i he l oyme tmiy s i s tEEOC' ' ) Ri - o- notce ' D e e ntc e t tPl i if s c pl ntw a fl d on Se e be 1 ghtt sue i .' f nda ont nds ha a ntf ' om ai s ie pt m r 7, 2 1 ,t ihi nn t- n ( 1 d y atrhsa mitdrc it ft eRih -o s n tc . 0 2 < c s ieyo e 9 ) a s fe i d te e ep o h g tt- ue o ie' wh ' How e r a t pr s Pl i i fpoi s o i hi r po e i o ve , s he o e a ntf nt ut n s es ns n pposton t t m oton t ii o he i o dimi s Se e r16,201 f lon a Sunda The e or unde Rul 6 oft Fe r Rul sof s s , pt mbe 2, el y. r f e, r e he de al e Ci lPr edu e t tm e f rflng t co pli wa e e vi oc r , he i o ii he m a nt s xt nded t M onda Se e r 1 201 o y, pt mbe 7, 2. S e Fe .R.Ci P.6 a( )C) 6 a( ) s ealop/ r v La o ,2 0 W L 1 5 4 0 * n.4 e d v. ()1( , ()3 ; e s ry . Ho d 0 9 307 7 ( D. . 0 9 , ya v Ar ma kM a a me t r ie Lt. rn r hp, 9 F.d 1 1 ,1 2 E. Va 2 0 ) Pa n . a r n ge n Se vc s d Pa te s i 4 5 3 1 9 1 5 . ( t Ci.2 0 ) Mia v UL.Po tlS r ie 6 4 F.d 8 0 8 2 ( 1h Ci.1 8 ;Ka e 9h r 0 7 , lm . S sa e vc , 7 2 6 , 6 1 t r 9 2) n . Dou as Eli gl , lman,Holyda (; v s,635 F. 1 ,1 ( Ci.1 0) Pe s v Fur o l y : Ie Q 2d 41 42 2nd r 98 4 ar on . nc Cons.Co. 563F.d 81 81 (t Ci.1 ; rdgev Galaude Unieri 7 F.Supp.2d t , 2 5, 9 7h r 977) Ak i . l t v st 29 y, 1 2 1 8 ( D. 201 ) Lu a dniv Ma s c s t M u.LfeI s Co,6 6 F.S p 2d 1 9 7 , 7 D. C. 0 ; n r i . s a hu et t s n. . 9 u p. 4 , 1 ( Conn. 0) Hu onv.TeamsesLoc Uni No.957,536F.Supp.11 ,11 ( D. 60 D. 201 ; ds tr al on 38 46 S. Ohi 1 2) lb v.Sheb Ct?;pGov r nt 508F.Su 1 1 ( . Te 1 ) o 98 9 r y ly pz/ e nme , z. pp. 080, 083 W D. nn. 981. A c or ngl D e e nts m oto t di m i s w il be de ed. An a pr pr a e or r c di y, f nda ' in o s s l ni p o i t de a om pa e t sm e or nd opi on. cc ni s hi m a um ni Ent r d t s 2 da ofM a 2013. e e hi nd y y, NO K .M O U M TED STATES DI STRI J GE CT UD 2- -
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
