Hancox v. Augusta General District Court, Judge William Goodwin, No. 5:2013cv00091 - Document 7 (W.D. Va. 2013)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 10/10/2013. (jat)

Download PDF
(e O G A I U. D1 cotr CE S. Sm l ATM SONBURG VA . FI * I TH E UNITED STATE S DISTR ICT COU RT N FO R THE W E STERN D I STR I O F VIRG INI CT A H A RRISO N SBU RG DI ISION V 02T l9 23 1 JUm C. , e DEP JO H N LAM ER H AN CO X , Pl ntf , ai if Ci lA c on No. 5: v091 vi ti : 13c V. A UG U STA G ENEM L D ISTR ICT C OU RT, JUD GE W I AM G O O DW I , LLI N By: H on.M i chaelF.U rbans ki Unied St esD it ctJudge t at s ri Def endant. M EM OR ADU M OPINIO N J La e H a o pr s ,b o tt sa ton on Oc obe 1 201 a i tt ohn m r nc x, o e r ugh hi c i t r , 3, ga ns he Honor bl W ila G o a e li m odwi a sti J n, it udgeoft Augus G e r lDit i tCou q f ac i ng he t ne a s rc r or tons tke b J geGo wi i hi r ea aj geoft tc ur.Thi c ur dimis dtec eonte a n y ud od n n s ol s ud ha o t s o t s se h as h grundsof udiili o j ca mmuniyo Ocobe 3, 3.( eDktNos 5 .OnOco r1 201 , t n t r 201 Se .) tbe 0, 3 Pl i ifs it pl a ngst ta e l r el uni t li bl . The co twas how e r a e t a ntf ubm ted e di ha r a g y n e lgi e ur , ve , bl o ge no ec mp e e sbeo jcin ta o eo tea t o ie ctdi t ec u t me rn u la n o rh n il be to :h t n f h uh rt s i n h o r' moa d m i e s opi o ( . 4)dimisngt c s , tl v.Whieh s,3 F. 1 ( hCi.1 )( r nin DktNo. s si he a e Bate t urt 6 3d 091 4t r 994 pe c im) wasu ura , npubls d.Thec r teeor c tu st epla ngsa motonfr ihe ou th rf e onsr e hes e di s i o rc ieai ofj me ( . 6)purua t Fe R.Ci P. e. Tha motonwil e onsd rton udg nt DktNo. s nto d v 59()1 t i lbe de ed. ni llj ap s-u g n moinifldwi ntnd y o tee tyo j d me t n c lsit q eto tec re te s çlf ot d me t t s i t e a s fh nr fu g n a d al no u sin h orcn s ç j o e hi o tajd metiso l b tetda amoinu d r l 5 ()h we e ima b fr l sye . Do ev f h tu g n t h ud e rae s t n e Rue 9e, o v rt y e omal tld' v . o y ' CODES 5 9F.d 8 7 s 9( t Ci. 9 s ; e as M LC Au o tv . v. wno S uh r Pie , 3 CO, 6 2 0 , 0 4 h r 1 7 ) s e lo tmoi e LLC To f o t en n s 5 2 F.d2 9 2 7 8( t Ci. 0 8 ( oi gCODES c n iu st a p yn t tsa dn t ea n me tt Fe ea 3 6 , 7 -7 4 h r 2 0 ) n tn CO o t e o p l o wi tn ig h me d n o d r l n h Ru eo Ap elt Pr c d r 4 . l f p l e o e ue ) a dAlhough Pt ntf i cor ectt tunpubls opi onsdo notvons iut bi ng d t ai if s r . ha ihed ni tt e ndi pr ectdence,unpubls opi onscan beper uasve when t addr ques i cur enty ihed ni s i hey ess tons r l beor t Cour. Matnv.ClmsnUni , F.Su 2d41 41 ( S. 2009 ;seas f e he t' ri ' e o v.654 pp. 0, 7 D. C. ) e lo Coli v. lns PondCre Mi naCo.468F. 21 21 20( hCi. )( di unp ihe e k ni , 3d 3, 9- 4t r2006 hol ng ubls d decsonsSobee tte t t wegh t yge rt byt pes sve soft i raoni ii i t nild o he i the neae he rua i nes her e s nf). Eve mor i ranl BatectsKi v. r, F. 3 ( hCi.9 ,apubls d n e mpo t ty, tl ie ng Mye s973 2d 54 4t r1 92) ihe Fou t Cic tc e f rt pr poston ofl w f rwhi h t c tc t d i- a f c m a rh r ui as , o he o ii a o c he our ie t a t de abundanty cl y i t cour' m em or l earl n he ts andum opi on ofOct ni ober3,2013. The r ai ofPl ntf ' ar enti utery i em nder ai if s gum s t l ncom pr ehensbl and war ant no f her i e r s urt dicus on. s si Pl n if sm o i i t r f evoi ofe n t s i ht tm e i. l s l be de e by ai tf ' ton s he e or d ve he lg es rt t ha l ni d a pr i t or re e e t sda p opra e de nt r d hi y. The Cl k i diec ed t s a cerii copy oft sOr t t pr sepl ntf . er s r t o end tfed hi der o he o ai if Ent r d; Oc obe l 201 ee t r 0, 3 / m4 J f W G +/' A Mi chaelF.Ur ki bans Unied St esDi ti J t at srct udge

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.