Cincinnati Casualty Company v. TMO Global Logistics, LLC et al, No. 3:2012cv00059 - Document 68 (W.D. Va. 2013)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Glen E. Conrad on 09/24/2013. (ssm)

Download PDF
cuERx' oil u.. sr counr s rncs s Dl . g. q A RoA T xo , (j.. yA o t FIS: L . . y . SEF 2# 2 1 23 I THE UN I N TED STATES DI STRI CO UR T CT FOR TH E W ESTERN D I STRI O F V I N I CT RGI A CH AR LOTTESV I LLE D I SI VI ON J E sUL4 UD$'GL z v l' -Yc ' ; Lt ' ' DPTCEK ' UYL j R , , , CI CI ATICA SU ALTY COM PAN Y , N NN Pl i if a ntf , Ci lA c i n N o. 1 vi to 3: 2CV 00059 M EM O M ND U M O PI I N N O TM O GLOBAL LOGI CS,LLC,4g= STI : 1 By: o Gl n E. H n. e Conr ad ChifUnie St t sDititJ e t d a e src udge D e e nt . f nda s Ci i t Cauat Compa (C nci t' tldt si epl de aci purua t 28 ncnnai s ly ny t l i' ie hi ntr ea r ton, s nt o ci ma ) U. C.j1 s e ngt deemi t pr rditi i oft pr e ofa$1 000pr t S. 335, e ki o tr ne he ope srbuton he oc eds 0, opery br r ss e y bond. Ci i na ihasm ove f a a a d ofa t ne s f esa c t t be pa d oke ' ur t nc n t d or n w r tor y' e nd os s o i f om t bond pr e . Fo t f l ng r a o ,t m oton wilbe de ed. r he oce ds r he olowi e s ns he i l ni B ackzround Ataltmesr e ntt t i tnta ton,TM O Gl lLogitcs LLC (' O' wasa 1 i elva o he nsa ci oba si , ;TM ' ) pr r y br rt ta r nge f t t a pora i ofgoodsby m ot c r i r . l a c da e ope t oke ha r a d or he r ns t ton or a r e s n c or nc wih f de all TM O obt i d a s e ybond i t a o of$1 000 fom Ci i t. Se 49 t e r aw, ane ur t n he m unt 0, r ncnna i e U. C.j 1 S. 3906( ;49C. R.j387. a (t pr rybr mus ha as r t bo ortus b) F. 307() ; ope t oker t ve u ey nd r t A f i efc fr$1 000.'.Thebondi itnde t L ns r t fna ilr s i lt oft und n fe t o 0, 5 ) s ne d o ç u e he i nca eponsbiiy he e br rby pr di f pa e s t s ppe sorm ot c r i r i t br ke f l t c r ou is oke ovi ng or ym nt o hi r or a r e s f he o r ais o ary t t c r t ,ag ee e s ora r ng m e sf t s yi oft a por a i by a hor z d m ot ontac s r m nt , r a e nt or he uppl ng r ns t ton ut i e or c rir. 49C. R.j387. b) ares' ' F. 3074 . c t a enotgr nt d a ama trofc ur e' Gr e, 6 F.Supp. a 71 I e r ii is oss r a e s te o s . os 46 ' 2d t 7. n xe c sng t e t bl di c e i t c t us ba a t r gh s oft s a hol raga ns t r g soft quia e s r ton, he our m t l nce he i t he t ke de i t he i ht he be t c a i oft f ne i i res he und. Se Fr nte I . v.M i s o Ca r e .I , o. - 51 1 W L e o i r ns Co. s i n r i r nc. N 91 51 , 992 209299,1 U. DitLEXI 1 992 S. s. S 2904,a *7( N. Aug.24,1992) t D. J. . Ha ng co i r d t pa te 'a gume s t a i a e c el w,a t pa tc a vi nsde e he ris r nt, hc pplc bl as a nd he ri ulr c r um sa s oft sca e,t cour de i t a a d a t ney' f esa c t t Ci nna i i c t nce hi s he t clnes o w r tor s e nd os s o nci t . Unlke m a i e pl de a tons t bond f a i s i t s c s w a r quied by f de all w . i ny nt r ea r c i , he und t s ue n hi a e s e r e r a The ce i entoft a ia esaut a r ulto i t pr dea las $1 000 of lar nt he pplc bl t t e nd eg ai ns s o ovi t e t 0, pr e ton t m ot ca r e si t e ntt ta lc ns d pr ry br rf ist c r y o is ot c i o or r i r n he ve ha i e e ope t oke a l o a r ut t c r t oblgai .See49C. R.j387. b) s ealoRL1Trns Co.608F. 848, ontacual i tons F. 3074 , e s . a p. , 3d 849( C.Ci.201 (t dealrgulto rquiebr r t obanas eybond-a nt a D. r 0) C r e ains e r okes o ti ur t Fe ki o g r nt e- i t amountof$1 000.The e or ,i abr rdoe no pa atuc r t s ey ua a e n he 0, r f e f oke s t y r ke , he ur t doe s a latupt $10, ') s o, t e s o 000. . ' La t r a J n a gue t tr duc ng t bond pr e t pa t s e y' l l nds a nd owi r ha e i he oc eds o y he ur t s ega e ns w o d f us r t t i e oft sa u or a r gul t y pr s o . The de e xpe es ul r t a e he nt nt he t t t y nd e a or ovi i ns f ndan s t' a gum e ha be n a ed b ot rc t f ce w ih i e i lbonds a t s c ta s fnds i r nt s e dopt y he our s a d t d ntca , nd hi our l o i t per uasi See Fr i I Co. 1992 W L 209299,1992 U . D it.LEX IS 12904,at*13; s ve. onter ns. , S. s Unie SttsFi & Gua . v. ihTrns Sevs.I ,No.88- N,si op.a 4 ( D. td ae d. r Co. Fat a p. r . nc. 782- lp t E. Va. b.8,1 ) W as ngonl 'l .Co. AGSEnessl , 3: 068 si op. t6 Fe 990 , hi t ntl ns v. . tr. nc.No. 87- 2, lp a ( . Tem. .1 1 9) I s m,heco tc l t tgr tngCi i t' rques f M D. l Apr 4, 98 . n u t ur oncudes ha mli ncnnais e t or att ney' f and cost w oul be i or s ees s d nappropri e,snce i woul ef ectvel deprve t cl m ant at i t d f i y i he ai s oft pr ect on t whi t ar entted underf he ot i o ch hey e il ederall . aw

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.