Lovelady et al v. Five Star Quality Care-VA, LLC, No. 4:2018cv00018 - Document 24 (E.D. Va. 2018)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER. The Court DENIES Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand (ECF No. 10). The Court also GRANTS Defendant's Motion to Compel Arbitration (ECF No. 6),STAYS these proceedings pending completion of arbitration, and DIRECTS the Clerk of Co urt to remove this case from the active docket. Because the Court has referred all of Plaintiffs' claims for arbitration, Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Punitive Damages Claim is DENIED AS MOOT (ECF No. 8). Finally, Defendan t's request for a Protective Order is also DENIED AS MOOT (ECF No. 20). The parties are DIRECTED to file a status report with the Court every sixty days from the date of this Opinion and Order. Signed by District Judge Mark S. Davis on 7/25/2018. (jrin) Modified on 7/25/2018 (jrin, ).

Download PDF
Lovelady et al v. Five Star Quality Care-VA, LLC Doc. 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Newport News Division JOHN M. LOVELADY, AND BEVERLY C. LOVELADY, Plaintiffs, Case No.: V. FIVE STAR QUALITY CARE-VA, 4:18cvl8 LLC, d/b/a DOMINION VILLAGE OF WILLIAMSBURG, Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on a by Plaintiffs John M. Lovelady Lovelady 10, ("Mrs. Lovelady") Dismiss Punitive Arbitration, 21. Plaintiffs' Compel and Beverly C. LLC, Damages the Motion Arbitration 7, Claim, 8, Motion to Motion to Compel and a Motion for Protective Order, reasons to ECF No. ECF No. d/b/a Dominion Village ("Dominion Village" or "Defendant") ECF No. For Lovelady") {collectively "Plaintiffs"), and Five Star Quality Care-VA, of Williamsburg's No. (''Mr. Motion to Remand filed noted Remand, and completion of arbitration, STAYS below, GRANTS these the Court Defendant's DENIES Motion proceedings ECF to pending DENIES AS MOOT Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Punitive Damages Claim, and DENIES AS MOOT Defendant's Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.