Adams v. Unknown, No. 3:2024cv00022 - Document 3 (E.D. Va. 2024)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 3/1/2024. (jpow, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Adams v. Unknown Doc. 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division TYLER CHASE ADAMS, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 3:24cv22 V. UNKNOWN. Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff, a Virginia inmate proceeding pro se, submitted a letter complaining about his conditions of confinement and an institutional charge and asks the Court for assistance. (ECF No. 1.) By Memorandum Order entered on January 18, 2024, the Court explained that it may not provide legal assistance to litigants. However, the Court directed the Clerk to mail PlaintiiTa standardized form for filing a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. 'I'hc Court explained that if Plaintiff wished to file a complaint at this time, he should complete and return the form to the Court within thirty (30) days of the date of entry thereof. The Court noted that, if Plaintiff failed to take any action within that time, the Court would dismiss the action without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). More than thirty (30) days have elapsed, and Plaintiff has not completed and returned the § 1983 complaint form. Accordingly, this action will be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. An appropriate Order shall accompany this Memorandum Opinion. Dale: M. Hamiahl Richmond, Virginia United States District Judge m7 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
