Perry v. Unknown, No. 3:2023cv00728 - Document 3 (E.D. Va. 2024)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 1/9/24. (Khan, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Perry v. Unknown Doc. 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division STEVEN PERRY Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 3:23cv728 V. UNKNOWN Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff, who appears to be civilly committed and proceeding pro se, submitted a letter requesting the “Court's help with providing me with the completion of five (5) 1983 forms and five (5) [in] forma pauperis forms." (ECF No. 1, at 1.) By Memorandum Order entered on November 20, 2023, the Court explained that it cannot provide Plaintiff with legal advice and cannot assist him with filling out forms. Nevertheless, the Court sent Plaintiff a fomi for filing a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Court explained that if Plaintiff wished to file a complaint at this time, he should complete and return the form to the Court within thirty (30) days of the date of entry thereof The Court noted that if Plaintiff failed to take any action within that time, the Court would dismiss the action without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). More than thirty (30) days have elapsed and Plaintiff has not completed and returned the § 1983 complaint form. Accordingly, this action will be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. An appropriate Order shall accompany this Memorandum Opinion. /t I q(606M M. Hannah I Richmond, Virginia United State! Date: btrict Judge Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
