Jamison v. Flemming et al, No. 3:2023cv00384 - Document 3 (E.D. Va. 2023)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 7/20/2023. (adun, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Jamison v. Flemming et al Doc. 3 Case 3:23-cv-00384-MHL-MRC Document 3 Filed 07/20/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID# 27 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division DANIEL W. JAMISON, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 3:23cv384 V. LESLIE FLEMMING, et ai, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff, a Virginia inmate, has submitted this action and requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The pertinent statute provides: In no event shall a prisoner bring a civil action [in forma pauperis] if the prisoner has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is under imminent danger of serious physical injul:y^ 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(g). Plaintiff has at least three other actions or appeals that have been dismissed as frivolous, malicious, or for Ihilure to state a claim. See Jamison v. Robinson, No. 3:23cv346, 2023 WL 3819370, at *4 (E.D. Va. June 5, 2023); Jamison v. Herring, No. 3:22cv360, 2023 WL 3669384, at *6 (E.D. Va. May 25, 2023); Jamison v. Kassa, No. 3:22cv552, 2023 WL 3321731, at *4 (E.D. Va. May 9, 2023). Plaintiffs current complaint does not suggest that he is in imminent danger of serious physical hann. Accordingly, his request to proceed in forma pauperis will be DENIED. The action will be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiff remains free to submit a new complaint with the full $402.00 filing fee. The Court will process such a complaint as a new civil action. An appropriate Order shall accompany this Memorandum Opinion. i/UL Date: r Richmond, Virginia r r . M. Hannah I c^ ^ United States Ensir ct Judge Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
