Harris v. Martin et al, No. 3:2023cv00344 - Document 5 (E.D. Va. 2023)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Roderick C. Young on 7/25/2023. (adun, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Harris v. Martin et al Doc. 5 Case 3:23-cv-00344-RCY-MRC Document 5 Filed 07/25/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID# 24 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division ANTOINE EUGENE HARRIS, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 3:23CV344 (RCY) NURSE MARTIN, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION By Memorandum Order entered on June 15, 2023, the Court conditionally docketed Plaintiff’s action.1 On July 17, 2023, the United States Postal Service returned the June Memorandum Order to the Court marked, “RETURN TO SENDER,” and “ATTEMPTED- NOT KNOWN,” and “UNABLE TO FORWARD.” (ECF No. 4, at 1.) Since that date, Plaintiff has not contacted the Court to provide a current address. Plaintiff’s failure to contact the Court and provide a current address indicates his lack of interest in prosecuting this action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Accordingly, the action will be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. An appropriate Order shall accompany this Memorandum Opinion. Date: July 25, 2023 Richmond, Virginia /s/ Roderick C. Young United States District Jud Judge dge 1 Plaintiff had a different address on his Complaint than on the envelope that suggests that he may have been or anticipated being released. (See ECF No. 1, at 1; ECF No. 1–1.) The Court mailed the Memorandum Order to the return address on the envelope. Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
