Sanford v. City of Franklin et al, No. 3:2021cv00046 - Document 95 (E.D. Va. 2022)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 9/23/2022. (Copy mailed to plaintiff) (smej, )

Download PDF
Sanford v. City of Franklin et al Doc. 95 Dockets.Justia.com Complaint, it will be DENIED. The Court also DENIES Sanford's Motion to Join the Department of Justice. (ECF No. 85.) The Court will GRANT the Motions to Dismiss, (ECF Nos.42, 44, 46), and will DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE the Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 40.) The Court will DENY the Motions for Sanctions. (ECF Nos.49, 50.) The Court will also DENY Selective's Motion for Protective Order, (ECF No. 66), and the remainder of Sanford's Motions, (ECF Nos. 53, 54, 56, 58, 64, 69, 71, 73, 79, 82, 84, 87, 90, 91, 92), as MOOT. An appropriate Order shall issue. q/ Date: !) fJJA RichmoJci, Vir'i ia M.Ha 24

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.