Haba v. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) et al, No. 3:2020cv00689 - Document 5 (E.D. Va. 2020)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION Dismissing Habeas Petition Without Prejudice). Signed by District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 11/24/2020. Copy mailed to Petitioner. (tjoh, )

Download PDF
Haba v. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) et al Doc. 5 Case 3:20-cv-00689-HEH-EWH Document 5 Filed 11/24/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID# 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division MOUSSA MOISE HABA, Petitioner, Civil Action No. 3:20CV689-HEH DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY,era/., Respondents. MEMORANDUM OPINION (Dismissing Habeas Petition Without Prejudice) Petitioner, proceeding pro se, submitted a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. By Memorandum Order entered on October 9,2020,the Court informed Petitioner that in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, all pro se petitions for writs of habeas corpora must be filed on a set of standardized forms. See E.D. Va. Loc. Civ. R. 83.4(A). The Court mailed Petitioner the standardized form for filing a § 2241 petition and directed him to complete and return the form to the Court within eleven(11)days ofthe date of entry hereof. The Court warned Petitioner that the failure to complete and return the form in a timely manner would result in dismissal ofthe action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). More than eleven(11)days have elapsed since the entry ofthe October 9, 2020 Memorandum Order and Petitioner has not responded and Petitioner has not returned the standardized form. Accordingly, the action will be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Dockets.Justia.com Case 3:20-cv-00689-HEH-EWH Document 5 Filed 11/24/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID# 14 An appropriate order will accompany this Memorandum Opinion. HENRY E.HUDSON Date: hiatf.iH 2en.O Richmond, Virginia SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.