Reed v. Robinson, No. 3:2020cv00200 - Document 64 (E.D. Va. 2021)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge John A. Gibney, Jr on 7/28/2021. (jpow, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Reed v. Robinson Doc. 64 Case 3:20-cv-00200-JAG-EWH Document 64 Filed 07/28/21 Page 1 of 13 PageID# 330 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division KIM ALTON REED, JR., Plaintiff, Civil Action No.3:20CV200 V. T. ROBINSON, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Kim Alton Reed,Jr.,a Virginia inmate proceeding pro se and informa pauperis, filed this 42 U.S.C.§ 1983 action.1 In his Particularized Complaint (''Complaint," E CF No. 16),Reed raises the following claims for relief: 2 Claim One: Defendants Harris, Ngoule, Smith, and Minter denied Reed "adequate medical care " in violation the Eighth Amendment.3 (Id. at 8.) Claim Two: Defendants T.Robinson and I. Hicks failed to provide "reasonable safety " for Reed in violation of the Eighth Amendment. (Id) Claim Three: Defendant Minter falsified records to avoid liability. (Id) 1 That statute provides,in pertinent part: Every person who,under color of any statute ...of any State ...subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws,shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law .... 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 2 The Court employs the pagination assigned by the CM/E CF docketing system to the parties' submissions. The Court corrects the spelling, punctuation, and capitalization and omits the emphasis in quotations from the parties' submissions,unless otherwise noted. 3 "Excessive bail shall not be required,nor excessive fines imposed,nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted." U.S. Const.amend.VIII. Dockets.Justia.com Case 3:20-cv-00200-JAG-EWH Document 64 Filed 07/28/21 Page 2 of 13 PageID# 331 Case 3:20-cv-00200-JAG-EWH Document 64 Filed 07/28/21 Page 3 of 13 PageID# 332 Case 3:20-cv-00200-JAG-EWH Document 64 Filed 07/28/21 Page 4 of 13 PageID# 333 Case 3:20-cv-00200-JAG-EWH Document 64 Filed 07/28/21 Page 5 of 13 PageID# 334 Case 3:20-cv-00200-JAG-EWH Document 64 Filed 07/28/21 Page 6 of 13 PageID# 335 Case 3:20-cv-00200-JAG-EWH Document 64 Filed 07/28/21 Page 7 of 13 PageID# 336 Case 3:20-cv-00200-JAG-EWH Document 64 Filed 07/28/21 Page 8 of 13 PageID# 337 Case 3:20-cv-00200-JAG-EWH Document 64 Filed 07/28/21 Page 9 of 13 PageID# 338 Case 3:20-cv-00200-JAG-EWH Document 64 Filed 07/28/21 Page 10 of 13 PageID# 339 Case 3:20-cv-00200-JAG-EWH Document 64 Filed 07/28/21 Page 11 of 13 PageID# 340 Case 3:20-cv-00200-JAG-EWH Document 64 Filed 07/28/21 Page 12 of 13 PageID# 341 Case 3:20-cv-00200-JAG-EWH Document 64 Filed 07/28/21 Page 13 of 13 PageID# 342
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
