Schmidt v. Walrath, No. 3:2019cv00806 - Document 4 (E.D. Va. 2019)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 12/04/2019. (Copy mailed to Petitioner) (smej, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Schmidt v. Walrath Doc. 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EX FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division DEC-jaw DANIEL LAMAR WINSLETT SCHMIDT, W-ERK, U.S. UlS IRICT COUOT RICHMONin VA Petitioner, Civil Action No.3:19CV806 V. JOHN F. WALRATH,WARDEN, Respondent. MEMORANDUM OPINION Petitioner, proceeding pro se, submitted a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. By Memorandum Order entered on November 12,2019, the Court directed Petitioner to complete and return, within eleven (11)days ofthe date of entry thereof, the standardized form for filing a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. More than eleven(11)days have passed and Petitioner has not returned the required § 2254 petition form. Accordingly, the petition will be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. An appropriate Order shall issue. M. Hannah Date:DEC 0 4 2019 United States D'istfict Judge Richmond, Virginia Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
