Ferrante v. Bolster et al, No. 3:2019cv00189 - Document 5 (E.D. Va. 2019)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 5/8/19. (jsau, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Ferrante v. Bolster et al Doc. 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division ALLEN KENNETH FEANTE, Petitioner, v. BOLSTER, et al., Respondents. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 3:19CV189-HEH MEMORANDUM OPINION (Dismissing Habeas Petition Without Prejudice) Petitioner, proceeding pro se, submitted a petition or a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. By Memorandum Order entered on April 4, 2019, the Court inormed Petitioner that in the United States District Court or the Easten District of Virginia, all pro se petitions or writs of habeas copora must be iled on a set of standardized orms. See E.D. Va. Loe. Civ. R. 83.4(A ). The Court mailed Petitioner the standardized orm or iling a § 2241 petition and directed him to complete and retun the om to the Court within iteen (15) days of the date of entry hereof. The Court waned Petitioner that the ailure to complete and retun the orm in a timely manner would result in dismissal of the action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). More than iteen (15) days have elapsed since the entry of the April 4, 2019 Memorandum Order and Petitioner has not responded and Petitioner has not retuned the Dockets.Justia.com standrdized orm. Accordingly, the action will be dismissed without prejudice. A certiicate of appealability will be denied. An appropriate order will accompany this Memorandum Opinion. Isl Date: , I 2 Of Richmond, Virginia HENRY E. HUDSON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
