Law v. Bolster, No. 3:2019cv00130 - Document 6 (E.D. Va. 2019)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 05/30/2019. (Copy sent to Petitioner) (smej, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Law v. Bolster Doc. 6 : L IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA p MAY 3 0 2019 Richmond Division y ULtRK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT RICHMOND. VA JAMEL C. LAW, Petitioner, Civil Action No. 3:19CV130 V. MARK BOLSTER, Respondent. MEMORANDUM OPINION Petitioner, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, submitted a 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 petition. By Memorandum Order entered on March 18, 2019, the Court directed Petitioner, within eleven (11) days of the date of entry thereof, to pay the $5.00 filing fee or explain any special circumstances that would warrant excusing payment ofthe filing fee. The Court warned Petitioner it would dismiss the action if Petitioner did not pay the filing fee or explain any special circumstances that would warrant excusing payment of the filing fee. By Memorandum Order entered on March 29, 2019, the Court granted Petitioner a forty-five(45) day extension in which to pay the fee. More than forty-five(45)days have elapsed since the entry ofthe March 29, 2019 Memorandum Order and Petitioner has not submitted the filing fee or otherwise responded. Accordingly, the action will be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. An appropriate Order shall accompany this Memorandum Opinion. M. Hannah L United States Di&trfc Date: MAY 3 0 2019 Richmond, Virginia Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
