Prasad v. Hampton Road Regional Jail et al, No. 3:2018cv00545 - Document 2 (E.D. Va. 2018)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 09/04/2018. (Copy mailed to Pro Se Plaintiff) (smej, ) (Main Document 2 replaced on 9/4/2018) (smej, ).
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Prasad v. Hampton Road Regional Jail et al Doc. 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division SUNDARI K.PRASAD, Plaintiff, V. Civil Action No.3:18CV545 HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL JAIL,et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff, a Virginia inmate, has submitted this action and requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The pertinent statute provides: In no event shall a prisoner bring a civil action [informa pauperis] if the prisoner has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(g). Plaintiff has at least three other actions or appeals that have been dismissed as frivolous or for failure to state a claim. See, e.g., Prasad v. Berger, No. 3:17CV74,2018 WL 2088749, at *6(E.D. Va. May 4, 2018); Prasad v. Judicial Inq. & Review Comm 'n.. No. 3:17CV498,2018 WL 2015809, at *4(E.D. Va. Apr. 30, 2018); Prasad v. Gothic Beauty Magazine, No. 3:17CV446,2018 WL 1863650, *5(E.D. Va. Apr. 18, 2018); Prasad v. United States, No. 3:17CV510,2018 WL 1143597, at *4(E.D. Va. Mar. 2, 2018), aff'd'No. 18-6256, 2018 WL 3654852, at *1 (4th Cir. Aug. 1, 2018); Prasad v. Washington Metro Police Dep't, No. 3:17CV140,2018 WL 1091999, at *4(E.D. Va. Feb. 28, 2018); Prasad v. KarnArtlnc., No. 3:17CV62,2017 WL 5012591, at *4(E.D. Va. Nov. 2, 2017), aff'dlU F. App'x 329(4th Cir. 2018); Prasad v. Delta Sigma Theta Sorority, /wc.. No. 3:16CV897,2017 WL 4399551, at Dockets.Justia.com *5(E.D. Va. Oct. 3, 2017), affdlU F. App'x 336(4th Cir. 2018). Plaintiffs current complaint does not coherently suggest that she is in imminent danger of serious physical harm. Accordingly, her request to proceed informa pauperis will be DENIED. The action will be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiff remains free to submit a new complaint with the full $400 filing fee. The Court will process such a complaint as a new civil action. An appropriate Order shall accompany this Memorandum Opinion. It is so ORDERED. M. Hannah orn / on 10 Date: SEP "4 2018 Richmond, Virginia United States Di'slrict Judge
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
