Sirleaf v. United States of America et al, No. 3:2017cv00539 - Document 28 (E.D. Va. 2018)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. SEE OPINION for complete details. Signed by District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 06/14/2018. Copy mailed to Plaintiff.(ccol, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Sirleaf v. United States of America et al Doc. 28 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division PRIEST MOMOLU V.S. SIRLEAF,JR., Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) V ) Civil Action No. 3:17CV539-HEH UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,et aL, Defendants. ) ) ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION (Dismissing Action Without Prejudice) Plaintiff, a Virginia inmate proceeding pro se and informa pauperis, filed this 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 action. Plaintiffs current allegations failed to provide each defendant with fair notice ofthe facts and legal basis upon which his or her liability rests. Accordingly, by Memorandum Order entered on May 9, 2018,the Court directed Plaintiff to submit a Second Particularized Complaint within fourteen(14)days ofthe date of entry thereof. The Court warned Plaintiff that the failure to submit the Second Particularized Complaint would result in the dismissal of the action. More than fourteen(14)days have elapsed since the entry ofthe May 9, 2018 Memorandum Order. Plaintiff failed to submit a Second Particularized Complaint or otherwise respond to the May 9, 2018 Memorandum Order. Accordingly, the action will be dismissed without prejudice. An appropriate order will accompany this Memorandum Opinion. /sL HENRY E. HUDSON Date; iH gO/P SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Richmond, Virginia Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
