Prasad v. Rolfe et al, No. 3:2017cv00064 - Document 19 (E.D. Va. 2018)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 07/03/2018. Copy mailed to Plaintiff. (walk, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Prasad v. Rolfe et al Doc. 19 I I IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA E JUL - 3 2018 Richmond Division SUNDARI K.PRASAD, Plaintiff, V. Civil Action No. 3:17CV64 MELINDA ROLFE,et ai. Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Sundari K. Prasad, a Virginia inmate proceeding pro se, submitted this action, and at least fifty other civil actions over the prior two years. Prasad's actions have been dismissed either as frivolous, malicious or for failure to state a claim, or because she has failed to follow the directives ofthe Court. Prasad's many actions have strained the resources ofthe Court. Accordingly, by Memorandum Order entered June 4,2018,the Court directed Prasad, within fourteen days of the date of entry thereof, to submit a certificate of compliance that required specific information from Prasad, before the Court would review her claims. The Court warned Prasad that a failure to comply with the Court's directives would result in dismissal of the action. More than fourteen (14) days have elapsed since the entry of the June 4, 2018 Memorandum Order. Prasad failed to submit the requisite certificate of compliance or otherwise respond to the June 4,2018 Memorandum Order. Accordingly, the action will be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. An appropriate Order will accompany this Memorandum Opinion. /s/ M. Hannah Lauck f?X 1/ United States District Judge Date: July 03/ 2018 Richmond, Virginia Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
