Coleman v. McNelis et al, No. 3:2016cv00961 - Document 45 (E.D. Va. 2018)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 6/25/2018. Copy to Pro Se Plaintiff as directed. (jsmi, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Coleman v. McNelis et al Doc. 45 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division RAYMOND COLEMAN, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 3:16CV961-HEH V. K McNELIS,et al. Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION (Dismissing Action Without Prejudice Against Four Defendants) Raymond Coleman, a Virginia prisoner proceeding pro se and informa pauperis, brings this action under 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), Coleman had ninety (90)days from the filing ofthe Complaint to serve the Defendants. Here, that period commenced on August 4, 2017. By Memorandum Order entered on November 28, 2017, the Court directed Coleman, within eleven(11) days of the date of entry thereof, to show good cause for his failure to serve the four Unknown and Unnamed Employees listed in the Complaint within the time required by Rule 4(m). Coleman has not responded to the Court's November 28, 2017 Memorandum Order. Accordingly, all claims against the four Unknown and Unnamed Employees listed in the Complaint will be dismissed without prejudice. An appropriate order will accompany this Memorandum Opinion. /sz Date: ^ Richmond, Virginia Henry E. Hudson Senior United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
