Marsh v. Brooks et al - Document 8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division RUDY CHRISTOPHER MARSH, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. LIEUTENANT BROOKS, 3:11CV662 et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION By Memorandum Order entered on October 2011, the Court conditionally docketed Marsh's action. At that time, the Court directed Marsh to to affirm his intention 18, pay the full filing fee by signing and returning a consent to the collection of fees form. The Court warned Marsh that a failure to comply with the above directives within thirty (30) days of the date of entry Marsh has not complied with the order of this Court. Marsh thereof would result in summary dismissal of the action. failed result, to return he Furthermore, instant the does he consent not has qualify not complaint. to See paid 28 collection for the in of forma statutory U.S.C. § PREJUDICE. Accordingly, this action will form. pauperis filing 1914(a). demonstrate a willful failure to prosecute. 41(b). fees fee Such See Fed. be As status. for the actions R. Civ. DISMISSED a P. WITHOUT The Clerk is DIRECTED to send a copy of the Memorandum Opinion to Marsh. /s/ Aar Robert E. Payne Senior United States District Judge Date: ^-VW^J, XC>SjL Richmond, Virginia