Reed v. Clarke, No. 2:2012cv00148 - Document 10 (E.D. Va. 2012)
Court Description: FINAL ORDER that the Court does accept the findings and Recommendations filed September 5,2012, and it is ORDERED that respondent's Motionto Dismiss be GRANTED, and that the petition be DENIED and DISMISSED with prejudice. It is further ORDERED that judgment be entered in favor of respondent; noting appeal procedure. Signed by District Judge Mark S. Davis on 10/3/2012 and filed on 10/4/2012. Copy mailed to petitioner.(rsim, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Reed v. Clarke Doc. 10 UNITED STAE THE FOR DISTRC EASTRN FILED COURT DISTRC OF Norflk VIRGNA Divson OCT 4 CLERK, TIANE LAVONE RED, NORFLK, #1203, US 201 DISTRC VA COURT Petionr, ACTION V. SIR HAROLD W. Virgna CLARKE, NO. 2:1CV48 Directo, Departmn of Corectins, Respondt. FINAL This mater petion was alegs intaed by violatn murde, degr of shoting April 23,07 coletivy to him an active of to the objectins (30) has has recivd under of his to a fiream Richmond, with § 254. The for comisn a result of of tweny-hr U.SC convits in as prison 28 pertaing use Staes § for whic (23) Magistre and Eastern (C) Distrc 5, objectins Judge 63(b)lB the Septmbr no corpus he years first- murde was on sentcd supend, givn years. U.SC filed Court of a United Court Recomndati The filng prejudic. Distrc 28 City in thiry to of habes and the years refd Staes and of of provisn United Report was of vehicl, Court serv a writ rights ocupied (53) to the an fity-hre petion for constiual Circut serv time The pursant the petion petionr's into in ORDE to and of 201, for Local Report recomndati Rule of 72 The dismal and and Civl Virgna. recomnds the repot Recomndati the of Magistre Rules Judge's the and petion the with time for expird. Dockets.Justia.com The Court does Recomndati herby filed to Dism be furthe and tha Petionr Norflk, of right," failed the Fedral Rules The Court of Clerk to shal of this a from "a isue copy of this to the date of Miler-E this entry of the Cockrel. UNITED Oc-Vo Norflk, W Virgna petionr 3> , 201 DISTRC of JUDGE filng a Stre, a constiual to S.Ct and DAVIS STAE is judgment. denial 123 /s S. by Granby pursant respondt. MARK It Orde such apelbity v. to Final 60 of of Orde and prejudic. Courthse, showing Final Report Motin with Staes certifa Se the respondt' DISME pursant subtanil any in respondt. United days Procedu. mail of court, (30) to Apelat favor forth tha and entrd demonstra declins ORDE DENI judgment thiry set therfo be in Clerk withn recomndatis is petion the the it entrd from with has therfo, the apel 23510, Petionr the be apel Virgna and and tha judgment may findgs 5,201 GRANTED, notice the Septmbr ORDE writen acept Rule 2(b) to 1029,3(). of counsel of recod for
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
