Joyner v. Prince William County Circuit Court et al, No. 1:2022cv00725 - Document 65 (E.D. Va. 2023)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION and Order granting Defendant's request for a pre-filing injunction contained in her Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 9) is GRANTED. Plaintiff is hereby ENJOINED from filing any further lawsuits against Defendant Emily Redman in the Eas tern District of Virginia arising out of or relating to the parties' family court matters in Prince William County Circuit Court, without priorleave of Court. It is further ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Sanctions (Dkt. 32) and Supplem ental Motion for Sanctions (Dkt. 60) are GRANTED. Plaintiff shall reimburse Defendant for her reasonable attorney's fees and costs incurred through this federal action, which amount to a total of $18,581.40, to be paid within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. Signed by District Judge Patricia Tolliver Giles on 07/19/2023. (see order for details)(dvanm)

Download PDF
Joyner v. Prince William County Circuit Court et al Doc. 65 Case 1:22-cv-00725-PTG-JFA Document 65 Filed 07/19/23 Page 1 of 12 PageID# 774 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division JUNIUS J. JOYNER,III, Plaintiff, Case No. 1:22-cv-00725(PTG/JFA) V. PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT,etal. Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Emily B. Redman's request for a pre- fiiing injunction (Dkt. 9), Motion for Sanctions Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11(b) and(c)(Dkt. 32), and Supplemental Motion for Sanctions(Dkt. 60). On July 27,2022, Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss, requesting that this Court (1) dismiss this action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) and (6); and (2) enter a pre-filing injunction against pro se Plaintiff Junius J. Joyner, III ("Motion").' Dkt. 9. On March 10, 2023, this Court entered an Order granting Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and setting a hearing on April 13, 2023 at 10:00 a.m. for Plaintiff to show cause as to why Defendant's request for a pre-filing injunction should not be granted. Dkt. 56. On April 13, 2023, Plaintiff failed to appear at the show cause hearing. Dkt. 61. The Court has reviewed the parties' memoranda and this case is now ripe for disposition. For the reasons stated below, Defendant's request for a pre-filing injunction (Dkt. 9) and motions for sanctions (Dkts. 32,60)are granted. 'Plaintiff is an attorney who is proceeding pro se. He is licensed in Washington, D.C. Dkt. 1 t 2. 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:22-cv-00725-PTG-JFA Document 65 Filed 07/19/23 Page 2 of 12 PageID# 775 Case 1:22-cv-00725-PTG-JFA Document 65 Filed 07/19/23 Page 3 of 12 PageID# 776 Case 1:22-cv-00725-PTG-JFA Document 65 Filed 07/19/23 Page 4 of 12 PageID# 777 Case 1:22-cv-00725-PTG-JFA Document 65 Filed 07/19/23 Page 5 of 12 PageID# 778 Case 1:22-cv-00725-PTG-JFA Document 65 Filed 07/19/23 Page 6 of 12 PageID# 779 Case 1:22-cv-00725-PTG-JFA Document 65 Filed 07/19/23 Page 7 of 12 PageID# 780 Case 1:22-cv-00725-PTG-JFA Document 65 Filed 07/19/23 Page 8 of 12 PageID# 781 Case 1:22-cv-00725-PTG-JFA Document 65 Filed 07/19/23 Page 9 of 12 PageID# 782 Case 1:22-cv-00725-PTG-JFA Document 65 Filed 07/19/23 Page 10 of 12 PageID# 783 Case 1:22-cv-00725-PTG-JFA Document 65 Filed 07/19/23 Page 11 of 12 PageID# 784 Case 1:22-cv-00725-PTG-JFA Document 65 Filed 07/19/23 Page 12 of 12 PageID# 785

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.