Norfolk Southern Railway Company v. Zayo Group LLC, No. 1:2021cv01299 - Document 37 (E.D. Va. 2021)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION re Defendants Motion to Dismiss for Improper Venue or in the Alternative, Motion to Transfer Venue to the Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria Division ECF Nos. 11 and 14 and Defendants Amended Motion to Dismiss for Improper Venue ECF No. 29 . Signed by District Judge Roderick C. Young on 11/23/21. (dbra, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Dockets.Justia.com MEMORANDUM OPINION I. BACKGROUND Norfolk Southern Railway Company v. Zayo Group LLC Doc. 37 Id. Id. Id. Id. Id. Id. Id. Id. Id. Id. Id. Id. Id. Id. Id. Id. Id. Id. Id. II. PROCEDURAL HISTORY III. STANDARDS OF REVIEW prima facie et seq. See Mitrano v. Hawes Ion Beam Applications, S.A. v. Titan Corp. Locklair v. Conair Corp., Inc. Id. Uffner v. La Reunion Francaise, S.A., T. & B. Equip. Co. v. RI, Inc. Douglas v. D.B. Va., LLC IV. PARTIES’ ARGUMENTS See Id. Id. Id. Id. Id. Id. Id. Id. V. DISCUSSION prima facie T. & B. Equip. Co. v. RI, Inc. Id. Id. Wye Oak Tech. Inc., v. Republic of Iraq Id. Mitrano v. Hawes substantial part Id. Id. Deady Advert., Inc. v. Foam Indus., Inc. Deady Advert. Deady Advert. Id. Id. Id. Deady Advert. Id. Cold Spring Harbor Lab'y v. Ropes & Gray LLP Deering Milliken Rsch. Corp. v. Textured Fibres, Inc. Deering Milliken Rsch. Corp. CMA CGM (Am.), LLC v. RLI Ins. Co. Cottman Transmission Sys., Inc. v. Martino Gulf Ins. Co. v. Glasbrenner VI. CONCLUSION
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
