Omeish v. Kincaid et al, No. 1:2021cv00035 - Document 40 (E.D. Va. 2021)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting Chief Rohrer's motion to dismiss 32 and granting in part Sheriff Kincaid's motion to dismiss 27 . Sheriff Kincaid is directed to file an answer within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order. Signed by District Judge Liam O'Grady on 6/15/2021. (dvanm, )

Download PDF
Omeish v. Kincaid et al Case 1:21-cv-00035-LO-IDD Document 40 Filed 06/15/21 Page 1 of 15 PageID# 198 Doc. 40 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division Abrar Omeish, Plaintiff, V. Case No. l:21-cv-0035 Hon. Liam O'Grady Sheriff Stacey Ann Kincaid, et al.. Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER This matter comes before the Court on motions to dismiss filed by Defendants Sheriff Stacey Ann Kincaid (Dkt. 27)and Chief David M. Rohrer(Dkt. 32). Both these Defendants are being sued in their official capacities and move for dismissal of Plaintiff Abrar Omeish's first amended complaint(Dkt. 24)pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). For the following reasons, Sheriff Kincaid's motion to dismiss(Dkt. 27)is GRANTED IN PART,and Chief Rohrer's motion to dismiss(Dkt. 32)is GRANTED. I. BACKGROUND This dispute arises from an arrest of Ms. Omeish by Defendant Officer J. Patrick ofthe Fairfax County Police Department("FCPD")on March 5, 2019. Dkt. 24, at 2^ 2. Officer Patrick has not filed a motion to dismiss, so Ms. Omeish's arrest is not presently at issue. See Dkt. 37, at 5("[A]lthough there is an excessive force component to this case related to Ms. Omeish being senselessly maced, the pending motions to dismiss do not regard it."). Instead, the instant motions concern the photographing of Ms. Omeish at the Fairfax County Adult Detention Center("ADC")during "booking" following her arrest, as well as the preservation of Ms. Omeish's images taken by Defendants. See id. Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:21-cv-00035-LO-IDD Document 40 Filed 06/15/21 Page 2 of 15 PageID# 199 Case 1:21-cv-00035-LO-IDD Document 40 Filed 06/15/21 Page 3 of 15 PageID# 200 Case 1:21-cv-00035-LO-IDD Document 40 Filed 06/15/21 Page 4 of 15 PageID# 201 Case 1:21-cv-00035-LO-IDD Document 40 Filed 06/15/21 Page 5 of 15 PageID# 202 Case 1:21-cv-00035-LO-IDD Document 40 Filed 06/15/21 Page 6 of 15 PageID# 203 Case 1:21-cv-00035-LO-IDD Document 40 Filed 06/15/21 Page 7 of 15 PageID# 204 Case 1:21-cv-00035-LO-IDD Document 40 Filed 06/15/21 Page 8 of 15 PageID# 205 Case 1:21-cv-00035-LO-IDD Document 40 Filed 06/15/21 Page 9 of 15 PageID# 206 Case 1:21-cv-00035-LO-IDD Document 40 Filed 06/15/21 Page 10 of 15 PageID# 207 Case 1:21-cv-00035-LO-IDD Document 40 Filed 06/15/21 Page 11 of 15 PageID# 208 Case 1:21-cv-00035-LO-IDD Document 40 Filed 06/15/21 Page 12 of 15 PageID# 209 Case 1:21-cv-00035-LO-IDD Document 40 Filed 06/15/21 Page 13 of 15 PageID# 210 Case 1:21-cv-00035-LO-IDD Document 40 Filed 06/15/21 Page 14 of 15 PageID# 211 Case 1:21-cv-00035-LO-IDD Document 40 Filed 06/15/21 Page 15 of 15 PageID# 212

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.