Miller v. McWilliams et al, No. 1:2020cv00671 - Document 128 (E.D. Va. 2021)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER- Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 92 ) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's partial motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 98 ) is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Liam O'Grady on 7/28/2021. (see Order for further details)(dest )

Download PDF
Miller v. McWilliams et al Case 1:20-cv-00671-LO-TCB Document 128 Filed 07/28/21 Page 1 of 19 PageID# 3356 Doc. 128 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division Robert M.Miller, Plaintiff, Case No. l:20-cv-0671 Jelena McWilliams, Hon. Liam O'Grady Chairwoman, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, et al. Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER This matter comes before the Court on the Parties' cross motions for summary judgment.' See Dkts. 92,98. For the following reasons. Defendants' motion (Dkt. 92)is GRANTED,and Plaintiffs motion (Dkt. 98)is DENIED. I. BACKGROUND This is a pro se employment Action brought by Plaintiff Robert Miller against his employer. Defendant Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation("FDIC"). Jelena McWilliams, Chairperson ofthe FDIC,is also named as a Defendant in her official capacity. Mr. Miller is white, male, fifty-four years old, disabled. Republican, and a repeat litigator ofemployment claims against the Defendants. In this matter, he asserts two operative causes of action.^ His first cause ofaction alleges violations of Title VII and the Rehabilitation Act due to Defendants' 'Mr. Miller motions for summary judgment only on his first cause of action. See Dkt. 98. At times, he argues against himself. See, e.g., Dkt. 121, at 2("Defendant's motion for summary judgment fails to satisly the summary judgment standard because there are genuine disputes over material facts...."); id at 13("Genuine issues of material fact exist as to Plaintiffs discrimination claims."). ^ A third cause of action was dismissed by stipulation ofthe Parties. See Dkt. 38. 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:20-cv-00671-LO-TCB Document 128 Filed 07/28/21 Page 2 of 19 PageID# 3357 Case 1:20-cv-00671-LO-TCB Document 128 Filed 07/28/21 Page 3 of 19 PageID# 3358 Case 1:20-cv-00671-LO-TCB Document 128 Filed 07/28/21 Page 4 of 19 PageID# 3359 Case 1:20-cv-00671-LO-TCB Document 128 Filed 07/28/21 Page 5 of 19 PageID# 3360 Case 1:20-cv-00671-LO-TCB Document 128 Filed 07/28/21 Page 6 of 19 PageID# 3361 Case 1:20-cv-00671-LO-TCB Document 128 Filed 07/28/21 Page 7 of 19 PageID# 3362 Case 1:20-cv-00671-LO-TCB Document 128 Filed 07/28/21 Page 8 of 19 PageID# 3363 Case 1:20-cv-00671-LO-TCB Document 128 Filed 07/28/21 Page 9 of 19 PageID# 3364 Case 1:20-cv-00671-LO-TCB Document 128 Filed 07/28/21 Page 10 of 19 PageID# 3365 Case 1:20-cv-00671-LO-TCB Document 128 Filed 07/28/21 Page 11 of 19 PageID# 3366 Case 1:20-cv-00671-LO-TCB Document 128 Filed 07/28/21 Page 12 of 19 PageID# 3367 Case 1:20-cv-00671-LO-TCB Document 128 Filed 07/28/21 Page 13 of 19 PageID# 3368 Case 1:20-cv-00671-LO-TCB Document 128 Filed 07/28/21 Page 14 of 19 PageID# 3369 Case 1:20-cv-00671-LO-TCB Document 128 Filed 07/28/21 Page 15 of 19 PageID# 3370 Case 1:20-cv-00671-LO-TCB Document 128 Filed 07/28/21 Page 16 of 19 PageID# 3371 Case 1:20-cv-00671-LO-TCB Document 128 Filed 07/28/21 Page 17 of 19 PageID# 3372 Case 1:20-cv-00671-LO-TCB Document 128 Filed 07/28/21 Page 18 of 19 PageID# 3373 Case 1:20-cv-00671-LO-TCB Document 128 Filed 07/28/21 Page 19 of 19 PageID# 3374

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.