Minas Urbina v. Barr et al, No. 1:2020cv00325 - Document 12 (E.D. Va. 2020)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION Signed by District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema on 6/4/2020. (See order for further details). (acha, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Minas Urbina v. Barr et al Case 1:20-cv-00325-LMB-MSN Document 12 Filed 06/04/20 Page 1 of 14 PageID# 294 Doc. 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division ELI SALVADOR MINAS URBINA, Petitioner, l:20-cv-325(LMB/MSN) V. WILLIAM BARR,in his official capacity as Attorney General ofthe United States, et al.. Respondents. MEMORANDUM OPINION Petitioner Eli Salvador Minas Urbina ("petitioner" or "Urbina") has filed a Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus("Petition") pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241, in which he alleges that he is being unlawfully detained by United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement("ICE"). In response to the Petition, respondents William Barr, Chad Wolf, and Kim Zanotti, who have been named in their respective capacities as Attorney General of the United States, Secretary ofthe Department of Homeland Security ("DHS"),and Director ofICE's Washington Field Office (collectively,"respondents"),' have filed a Motion for Summary Judgment("Motion"). Both the Petition and the Motion are now before the Court. For the following reasons, Urbina's Petition will be granted in part and dismissed in part, and respondents' Motion will be granted in part and denied in part. 'The Petition also named as a respondent Jeffrey Crawford in his official capacity as Warden of Immigration Centers for America in Farmville ("ICA-Farmville"), the facility at which petitioner is detained. In response, Crawford has asserted that he "is a private employee as opposed to a government actor and ... is therefore named solely as a nominal respondent in this case," and that he "takes no position on the legal basis of petitioner's immigration detention but, to the extent required to do so, incorporates by reference any response filed by the United States Attorney's Office on behalf ofthe other respondents."[Dkt. 10 ^ 1]. Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:20-cv-00325-LMB-MSN Document 12 Filed 06/04/20 Page 2 of 14 PageID# 295 Case 1:20-cv-00325-LMB-MSN Document 12 Filed 06/04/20 Page 3 of 14 PageID# 296 Case 1:20-cv-00325-LMB-MSN Document 12 Filed 06/04/20 Page 4 of 14 PageID# 297 Case 1:20-cv-00325-LMB-MSN Document 12 Filed 06/04/20 Page 5 of 14 PageID# 298 Case 1:20-cv-00325-LMB-MSN Document 12 Filed 06/04/20 Page 6 of 14 PageID# 299 Case 1:20-cv-00325-LMB-MSN Document 12 Filed 06/04/20 Page 7 of 14 PageID# 300 Case 1:20-cv-00325-LMB-MSN Document 12 Filed 06/04/20 Page 8 of 14 PageID# 301 Case 1:20-cv-00325-LMB-MSN Document 12 Filed 06/04/20 Page 9 of 14 PageID# 302 Case 1:20-cv-00325-LMB-MSN Document 12 Filed 06/04/20 Page 10 of 14 PageID# 303 Case 1:20-cv-00325-LMB-MSN Document 12 Filed 06/04/20 Page 11 of 14 PageID# 304 Case 1:20-cv-00325-LMB-MSN Document 12 Filed 06/04/20 Page 12 of 14 PageID# 305 Case 1:20-cv-00325-LMB-MSN Document 12 Filed 06/04/20 Page 13 of 14 PageID# 306 Case 1:20-cv-00325-LMB-MSN Document 12 Filed 06/04/20 Page 14 of 14 PageID# 307
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
