Wilson v. Young et al, No. 1:2019cv01526 - Document 45 (E.D. Va. 2021)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge T. S. Ellis, III on 12/15/2021. (nneb)(c/s)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Wilson v. Young et al Doc. 45 Case 1:19-cv-01526-TSE-TCB Document 45 Filed 12/15/21 Page 1 of 15 PageID# 327 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division Michael Wilson, ) Plaintiff, ) ) V. ) l:19cyl526(TSE/TCB) ) Ericka Young,et al., Defendants. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Federal inmate Michael Wilson initiated this civil action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics. 403 U.S. 388 (1971), alleging that federal officials at the Federal Correctional Institution in Petersburg, Virginia("FCI-Petersburg") violated his rights under the Eighth Amendment by not providing him adequate medical care with respect to "degenerative changes to [his feet]," including "MTP joint" damage and "bone spurring." [Dkt. Nos. 1, 3, 7, 10]. Plaintiff seeks an injunction: that relieves him from wearing the required institutional footwear; that requires the Federal Bureau of Prisons("BOP") to issue him a special shoe pass that would allow him to wear a different shoe; that requires he be referred to a Podiatrist and new x-rays; and/or a requirement that the BOP purchase him a pair of wide shoes. [Dkt. No. 1 at 10]. The defendants filed a motion to dismiss and a motion for summary judgment, with a brief in support of the motions and copies ofPlaintiffs medical records. [Dkt. Nos. 35-37]. Plaintiff received the notice required by Local Rule 7(K)and Roseboro v. Garrison. 528 F.2d 309(4th Cir. 1975)[Dkt. No. 38], and he has responded.[Dkt. No.41]. Plaintiff has also sought leave to amend his complaint to address arguments made by the Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:19-cv-01526-TSE-TCB Document 45 Filed 12/15/21 Page 2 of 15 PageID# 328 Case 1:19-cv-01526-TSE-TCB Document 45 Filed 12/15/21 Page 3 of 15 PageID# 329 Case 1:19-cv-01526-TSE-TCB Document 45 Filed 12/15/21 Page 4 of 15 PageID# 330 Case 1:19-cv-01526-TSE-TCB Document 45 Filed 12/15/21 Page 5 of 15 PageID# 331 Case 1:19-cv-01526-TSE-TCB Document 45 Filed 12/15/21 Page 6 of 15 PageID# 332 Case 1:19-cv-01526-TSE-TCB Document 45 Filed 12/15/21 Page 7 of 15 PageID# 333 Case 1:19-cv-01526-TSE-TCB Document 45 Filed 12/15/21 Page 8 of 15 PageID# 334 Case 1:19-cv-01526-TSE-TCB Document 45 Filed 12/15/21 Page 9 of 15 PageID# 335 Case 1:19-cv-01526-TSE-TCB Document 45 Filed 12/15/21 Page 10 of 15 PageID# 336 Case 1:19-cv-01526-TSE-TCB Document 45 Filed 12/15/21 Page 11 of 15 PageID# 337 Case 1:19-cv-01526-TSE-TCB Document 45 Filed 12/15/21 Page 12 of 15 PageID# 338 Case 1:19-cv-01526-TSE-TCB Document 45 Filed 12/15/21 Page 13 of 15 PageID# 339 Case 1:19-cv-01526-TSE-TCB Document 45 Filed 12/15/21 Page 14 of 15 PageID# 340 Case 1:19-cv-01526-TSE-TCB Document 45 Filed 12/15/21 Page 15 of 15 PageID# 341
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
