Jason II v. Mr. Call et al, No. 1:2019cv00274 - Document 33 (E.D. Va. 2020)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Anthony J Trenga on 8/26/2020. (lcre, )(c/s)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Jason II v. Mr. Call et al Doc. 33 Case 1:19-cv-00274-AJT-IDD Document 33 Filed 08/26/20 Page 1 of 14 PageID# 204 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division Hubert Alan Jason,II, Plaintiff, I:19cv274(AJT/IDD) V. Mr. Call,^ ah. Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Virginia inmate Hubert Jason initiated this ^ro ^civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act("RLUIPA"). In his complaint, plaintiff alleges that defendants Lt. Williams and Officer McDaniels (collectively "defendants") denied him certain items of religious property while he was held in the Special Housing Unit ofNottoway Correctional Center. Dkt. Nos. 1,10. Defendants have filed a motion for partial summary judgment, in which they argue that one of plaintiffs claims is moot and the others fail, at least in part, as a matter oflaw. Dkt. Nos. 23-24. Plaintiff received the notice required by Local Rule 7(K)and an opportunity to file responsive materials pursuant to Roseboro v. Garrison. 528 F.2d 309(4th Cir. 1975)[Dkt. No. 25] and opposes defendants' motion. Dkt. No. 27. For the reasons explained below, defendants' motion shall be granted in part and denied in part. I. Background In his complaint, plaintiff alleges that defendants improperly deprived him of several items of religious property between the dates of November 25, 2017 and December 10, 2017. Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:19-cv-00274-AJT-IDD Document 33 Filed 08/26/20 Page 2 of 14 PageID# 205 Case 1:19-cv-00274-AJT-IDD Document 33 Filed 08/26/20 Page 3 of 14 PageID# 206 Case 1:19-cv-00274-AJT-IDD Document 33 Filed 08/26/20 Page 4 of 14 PageID# 207 Case 1:19-cv-00274-AJT-IDD Document 33 Filed 08/26/20 Page 5 of 14 PageID# 208 Case 1:19-cv-00274-AJT-IDD Document 33 Filed 08/26/20 Page 6 of 14 PageID# 209 Case 1:19-cv-00274-AJT-IDD Document 33 Filed 08/26/20 Page 7 of 14 PageID# 210 Case 1:19-cv-00274-AJT-IDD Document 33 Filed 08/26/20 Page 8 of 14 PageID# 211 Case 1:19-cv-00274-AJT-IDD Document 33 Filed 08/26/20 Page 9 of 14 PageID# 212 Case 1:19-cv-00274-AJT-IDD Document 33 Filed 08/26/20 Page 10 of 14 PageID# 213 Case 1:19-cv-00274-AJT-IDD Document 33 Filed 08/26/20 Page 11 of 14 PageID# 214 Case 1:19-cv-00274-AJT-IDD Document 33 Filed 08/26/20 Page 12 of 14 PageID# 215 Case 1:19-cv-00274-AJT-IDD Document 33 Filed 08/26/20 Page 13 of 14 PageID# 216 Case 1:19-cv-00274-AJT-IDD Document 33 Filed 08/26/20 Page 14 of 14 PageID# 217
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
