Halozyme, Inc. v. Lee, No. 1:2016cv01580 - Document 173 (E.D. Va. 2018)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Claude M. Hilton on 7/31/2018. (rban, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Halozyme, Inc. v. Lee Doc. 173 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division HALOZYME, INC., Plaintiff, Civil Action No. l:16-cv-1580 V. ANDREI lANCU, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Plaintiff Halozyme, Inc.'s ("Halozyme") Complaint pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 145, seeking reversal of a patent rejection decision issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office ("USPTO"). I. Background Halozyme brought this action pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 145, challenging a final decision issued by the USPTO's Patent Trial and Appeal Board (the "Board") which affirmed the rejections of claims in U.S. application"). Patent The claims Application were 11/238,171 rejected on four ("the ^171 independent grounds: • unpatentable ("ODP") over 7,767,429 under obviousness-type double pantenting claims ("the M29 9 and 10 patent") of in U.S. view Patent of the No. U.S. Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
