Latimer v. Washington Gas Light Company et al, No. 1:2011cv00571 - Document 151 (E.D. Va. 2012)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION Re: 128 Motion for Relief from Judgment. Signed by District Judge Gerald Bruce Lee on 6/7/2012. Copy mailed to pltf pro se.(stas)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division LERON PATRICE LATIMER, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. I:llcv571 (GBL/TRJ) v. WASHINGTON GAS LIGHT COMPANY, et ai, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter is before the Court on Defendants Washington Gas Light Company ("WGL"), Long Term Disability Plan-Management Employee Plan, William Zeigler, Luanne S. Gutermuth, and Andrea Adams's Motion for Summary Judgment and Motion for Relief from Judgment. This case, brought under the federal Employees Retirement Income Security Act ("ERISA"), is about the failure of an employer, as a benefits plan administrator and fiduciary, to provide benefits plan information to a retired employee, as a participant in those plans. There are eight issues before the Court. The first issue is whether the Courtshould grant Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment on Plaintiffs claim for Defendants' failure to provide a sufficient summary plan description ("SPD") for her life insurance plan upon request, Count 7 of the Amended Complaint, and either dismiss this claim or impose no penalty. The Court finds no genuine issue of material fact as to Defendants' failure to make timely disclosure

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.