-TRJ MeadWestvaco Corporation et al v. Rexam PLC et al, No. 1:2010cv00511 - Document 347 (E.D. Va. 2011)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER that Plaintiffs MeadWestvaco Corp. and MeadWestvaco Calmar, Inc.'s objections 255 are OVERRULED. It is further ORDERED that Judge Jones' Order denying MVW's Motion to Compel 251 is AFFIRMED. Signed by District Judge Gerald Bruce Lee on 7/18/11. (tfitz, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION MEADWESTVACO CORPORATION, et al., Plaintiffs, Case No. I:10cv511 (GBL/TRJ) REXAM PLC, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiffs MeadWestvaco Corp. and MeadWestvaco Calmar, Inc.'s (together, "MWV") Motion Regarding Objections to Magistrate Judge's Ruling on Plaintiff's Motion to Compel. Rexam, (Dkt. No. 251.) PLC's ("Rexam") This case concerns Defendant alleged patent infringement. In its motion, Plaintiff objects to Judge Jones' Order denying MWV's motion to compel all of Rexam's x-ray diffraction ("XRD") "crystallinity test results, data, 242.) and protocols." (Dkt. No. The Court overrules Plaintiff's Objection and affirms Judge Jones' Order because there was no clear error and the ruling was not contrary to law.
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
