Graves v. Select Portfolio Servicing et al, No. 2:2020cv00458 - Document 25 (D. Utah 2020)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER ADOPTING 22 Report and Recommendations; DENYING Plaintiff's 14 Motion to Strike; and GRANTING the Moving Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (Docket Entries 12 and [20). A sua sponte motion to dismiss the Remaining Defendants is GRANTED, and this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 12/15/2020. (eat)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Graves v. Select Portfolio Servicing et al Doc. 25 Case 2:20-cv-00458-DAK Document 25 Filed 12/15/20 PageID.178 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH AARON N. GRAVES, ORDER ADOPTING AND AFFRIMING REPORT AND RECCOMENDATION Plaintiff, vs. Case No. 2:20-cv-00458-DAK-JCB SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC.; et al., Judge Dale A. Kimball Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett Defendants. This case was assigned to United States District Judge Dee Benson, who referred it to United States Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). (ECF No. 17.) On November 9, 2019, Magistrate Judge Bennett issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that: (1) Plaintiff’s motion to strike (ECF No. 14) be DENIED; (2) Defendants Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.; The Bank of New York Mellon as Trustee for CWABS, Inc. Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2005-4; Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.; Bank of America, N.A.; Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, LP; and America’s Wholesale Lender, Corp.’s (collectively, “Moving Defendants”) motions to dismiss (ECF Nos. 12, 20) be GRANTED; (3) A sua sponte motion to dismiss Defendants Ditech Financial, LLC fka Green Tree Servicing; BWW Law Group, LLC; Carrie M. Ward; and Howard Bierman (collectively, “Remaining Defendants”) be GRANTED; and (4) This action be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:20-cv-00458-DAK Document 25 Filed 12/15/20 PageID.179 Page 2 of 2 The Report and Recommendation also notified that the parties must file any objection to the Report and Recommendation within 14 days after receiving it. The court 1 has not received an objection to the Report and Recommendation even though more than a month has passed since it was issued. The court has revied the file de novo and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation in its entirety. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion to strike (ECF No. 14) is DENIED, the Moving Defendants motions to dismiss (ECF Nos. 12, 20) are GRANTED, a sua sponte motion to dismiss the Remaining Defendants is GRANTED, and this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. DATED this the 15th day of December, 2020. BY THE COURT: DALE A. KIMBALL United States District Judge 1 After the Report and Recommendation was issued, the case was reassigned from Judge Benson to this court. (ECF No. 23.) 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
