Cobb v. Winder et al, No. 2:2016cv00885 - Document 5 (D. Utah 2016)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM DECISION and DISMISSAL ORDER. Plaintiff filed a prisoner civil rights complaint,1 and was granted in forma pauperis status.2 However, Plaintiff has not obeyed the Court's September 12, 2016 order to file within thirty days a "certified copy of the trust fund account statements... for the 6-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint... obtained from the appropriate official of each prison at which prisoner is confined."3 The order was returned to sender, marked, NOT AT THIS ADDRESS. No forwarding address has been submitted. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that--for failure to obey the Courts order and to prosecute this case--Plaintiff's case is DISMISSED without prejudice. This case is CLOSED. Signed by Judge Jill N. Parrish on 12/6/16. (jlw)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Cobb v. Winder et al Doc. 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH BRENT MAYON COBB, Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM DECISION & DISMISSAL ORDER v. JAMES WINDER et al., Defendants. Case No. 2:16-CV-885-JNP District Judge Jill N. Parrish Plaintiff filed a prisoner civil rights complaint,1 and was granted in forma pauperis status.2 However, Plaintiff has not obeyed the Court's September 12, 2016 order to file within thirty days a "certified copy of the trust fund account statements . . . for the 6-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint . . . obtained from the appropriate official of each prison at which prisoner is confined."3 The order was returned to sender, marked, “NOT AT THIS ADDRESS.” No forwarding address has been submitted. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that--for failure to obey the Court’s order and to prosecute this case--Plaintiff's case is DISMISSED without prejudice. This case is CLOSED. DATED December 6, 2016. BY THE COURT: JUDGE JILL N. PARRISH United States District Court 1 See 42 U.S.C.S. § 1983 (2016). 2 See 28 id. § 1915. 3 See id. § 1915(a)(2). Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
