Osmond Senior Living v. Utah Department of Public Safety et al, No. 2:2015cv00749 - Document 17 (D. Utah 2016)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying without prejudice 16 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. Signed by Magistrate Judge Evelyn J. Furse on 2/9/16 (alt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Osmond Senior Living v. Utah Department of Public Safety et al Doc. 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION OSMOND SENIOR LIVING, LLC, a Utah limited liability company, Plaintiff, v. UTAH DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, UTAH DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH; MARK BURTON, an individual in his personal capacity, MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER DENYING STIPULATED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS Case No. 2:15-cv-00749-JNP-EJF Judge Jill N. Parrish Defendants. Magistrate Judge Evelyn J. Furse Defendants Utah Department of Public Safety, Utah Department of Health, and Mark Burton, along with Plaintiff Osmond Senior Living jointly move the Court for an additional seven (7) days beyond the current due date of February 9, 2016, or until February 16, 2016, for Defendants to file their reply memorandum in support of their motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 16.) Because the parties fail to provide good cause for the extension, the Court hereby DENIES the Motion without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6. Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b)(1). DATED this 9th day of February, 2016. BY THE COURT: EVELYN J. FURSE United States Magistrate Judge Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
