Garcia v. Patterson-UTI Drilling
Filing
33
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS as to 32 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Judge Dee Benson on 3/6/12. (jlw)
<![CDATA[
lOIZ t·IAR - b P 2: I 5
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OFDH~~T F UT;:,,/j
CENTRAL DIVISION
DARRELL GARCIA
Plaintiff,
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION
vs.
PATTERSON-UTI DRILLING
Defendant.
Case No. 2:11-cv-742
Judge Dee Benson
Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation issued by United States Magistrate
Judge David Nuffer on February l3, 2012, recommending that this case be dismissed without
prejudice.
This case was referred to the magistrate judge to conduct an initial pretrial conference
under DUCivR72-1. The conference was scheduled for January 11,2012 at 10:30 a.m. and pro
se Plaintiff, Darrell Garcia ("Plaintiff'), failed to appear. (Dkt. No. 28). The court therefore
issued an Order to Show Cause why the cause should not be dismissed. (Dkt. No. 29). Plaintiff
was specifically ordered to inform the court of the status of the case and intentions to proceed.
ld Plaintiff failed to respond to the Order to Show Cause.
Based on Plaintiff's failure to appear at hearings or participate in developing a schedule
in the case, and failure to respond to the Order to Show Cause, the magistrate judge
recommended that this case be dismissed without prejudice. (Dkt. No. 32).
The parties were notified of their right to file objections to the Report and
Recommendation within fourteen days after receiving it. Neither party has filed such an
objection.
Having reviewed all relevant materials, including the reasoning set forth in the Magistrate
Judge's Report and Recommendation, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and
hereby dismisses the case without prejudice.
DATED this ~ day of March, 2012.
D..-U- ;)..-e-~J1-.Dee Benson
United States District Judge
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
