Yeager et al v. Fort Knox Security Products, No. 2:2011cv00091 - Document 108 (D. Utah 2013)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM DECISION denying 105 Motion for Leave to File ; striking 103 MEMORANDUM in Opposition to Motion. Plaintiffs shall have until Thursday, August 15, 2013, to re-file their Opposition in accordance with DUCivR 10-1 and DUCivR 7-1. Defendant shall have until Monday, August 19, 2013, to file its reply. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 08/13/2013. (asp)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Yeager et al v. Fort Knox Security Products Doc. 108 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION GENERAL CHARLES E. CHUCK YEAGER, an individual; PMN II, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Plaintiffs, MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER DENYING STIPULATED MOTION REGARDING OVERLENGTH BRIEFING vs. FORT KNOX SECURITY PRODUCTS, INC., a Utah Corporation, Case No. 2:11-CV-91 Defendant. This matter is before the Court on a Stipulated Motion Regarding Overlength Briefing.1 Under DUCivR 7-1(e) this Court will approve such requests only for good cause and a showing of exceptional circumstances. The Court does not find exceptional circumstances here. The Motion will be denied, Plaintiffs Opposition will be stricken, and Plaintiffs will be required to re-file their opposition in accordance with DUCivR 10-1 and DUCivR 7-1. 1 Docket No. 105. 1 Dockets.Justia.com It is therefore ORDERED that the Stipulated Motion Regarding Overlength Briefing (Docket No. 105) is DENIED. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiffs Opposition to Defendant s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 103) is STRICKEN. Plaintiffs shall have until Thursday, August 15, 2013, to re-file their Opposition in accordance with DUCivR 10-1 and DUCivR 7-1. Defendant shall have until Monday, August 19, 2013, to file its reply. DATED August 13, 2013. BY THE COURT: _____________________________________ TED STEWART United States District Judge 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
