Wells Fargo Equipment Finance v. Hard Rock Excavation et al, No. 2:2009cv01030 - Document 19 (D. Utah 2010)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM DECISION granting 17 Motion for Entry of Default. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 05/11/2010. (asp)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION WELLS FARGO EQUIPMENT FINANCE, INC., Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANTS vs. HARD ROCK EXCAVATION, INC.; and CLINT W. HARDMAN, Case No. 2:09-CV-1030 TS Defendants. This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff s Amended Motion for Entry of Default Judgment Against Defendants. Plaintiff also requests the Court issue an issuance of a writ of replevin for one Volvo EC290BLC Hydraulic Excavator, S/N: EC290BLC11242. For the reasons discussed below, the Motion will be granted. I. Entry of Default Judgment Plaintiff filed its Complaint on November 18, 2009, seeking to collect amounts owed to it under two loan and security agreements entered into by Defendant Hard Rock. Defendant Hardman guaranteed Defendant Hard Rock s obligations. Defendants were served with copies of 1 the Summons, Complaint and a copy of Plaintiff s Motion for Issuance of Prejudgment Writ of Replevin on March 2, 2010. Defendants have not answered or otherwise responded to the Complaint. On April 13, 2010, the Clerk entered a Default Certificate against Defendant Hardman. On May 6, 2010, the Clerk entered a Default Certificate against Defendant Hard Rock. In declarations filed on April 7, 2010, Plaintiff established the amount owed under the Agreements, as of March 26, 2010, to be $120,601.74 and that the expenses and fees in connection with this action are $5,492.97.1 Thus, Plaintiff is entitled to an entry of a default judgment in the amount of $126,094.71. II. Writ of Replevin On May 5, 2010, the Court denied a Motion for Issuance of Prejudgment Writ of Replevin. Now that judgment has been entered the issuance of the writ is appropriate. In order to obtain a writ of replevin, Plaintiff must establish that 1) he is entitled to possession and (2) that defendant wrongfully detains the property.2 Pursuant to the Agreement in which Hard Rock borrowed $180,709.80, it granted Plaintiff s predecessor-in-interest a security interest in the excavator. This security interest was perfected with the Utah Department of Commerce. Defendant Hard Rock failed to make monthly payments on the loan. Both Section 12 of the Agreement and Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code give Plaintiff the right to repossess the excavator once Defendant Hard Rock 1 Docket No. 10; Docket No.11. 2 Utah R. Civ. P. 64B(b)(1)-(2). 2 defaulted on the loan. As Defendant Hard Rock has defaulted on the loan, Plaintiff is entitled to possession. As Defendant Hard Rock was notified of its default under the Agreement when it received a letter from Plaintiff dated October 28, 2008, and the excavator is still in Defendant Hard Rock s possession, it is wrongfully detained. Therefore, Plaintiff is entitled to a writ of replevin. III. Conclusion Based on the above it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff s Amended Motion for Entry of Default (Docket No. 17) in the amount of $126,094.71 is GRANTED. It if further ORDERED that the Clerk of Court issue a Writ of Replevin for the Volvo EC290BLC Hydraulic Excavator, S/N: EC290BLC11242, currently in possession of Defendant Hard Rock, located in Lehi, Utah. DATED May 11, 2010. BY THE COURT: _____________________________________ TED STEWART United States District Judge 3
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
