-DN Pia v. Supernova Media et al, No. 2:2009cv00840 - Document 100 (D. Utah 2011)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM DECISION granting 38 Motion to Dismiss without prejudice on the fiduciary duty claims. Counterclaimants may amend their counterclaim. Mr. Pia's motion is denied without prejudice as to all other counterclaims ; denying 44 Motion f or Preliminary Injunction. Nonetheless, Mr. Pia has stipulated, and the court has Ordered, that Mr. Pia will not to take any action or direct any action as to the film at issue here until he is allowed to do so in this action. The court further ORDER S that if any party Mr. Pia then represents is to take any action with respect to the film, Mr. Pia shall give the Counterclaimants 10 days notice prior to such action taking effect. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 2/28/2011. (jtj)

Download PDF
-DN Pia v. Supernova Media et al Doc. 100 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION JOSEPH G. PIA, an individual, Plaintiff, ORDER and MEMORANDUM DECISION vs. SUPERNOVA MEDIA, INC., a New York corporation, et al., Case No. 2:09-cv-840 CW Defendants. __________________________________ SUPERNOVA MEDIA, INC., a New York corporation, et al., Counterclaimants, vs. JOSEPH G. PIA, Counterclaim Defendant. __________________________________ SUPERNOVA MEDIA, INC., a New York corporation, et al., Third-Party Plaintiffs, vs. BENNETT TUELLER JOHNSON & DEERE, LLC, a Utah limited liability company, et al., Third Party Defendants. Dockets.Justia.com Now before the court are a motion by Plaintiff/Counterdefendant Joseph G. Pia to dismiss (Dkt. No. 38) and a motion by Defendants/Counterclaimants Supernova Media Inc., Julianne Michelle, Joycelyn Engle and Joseph Di Palma for a preliminary injunction (Dkt. No.44). For the reasons set forth on the record of the hearing on this matter held on February 25, 2011, the court ORDERS as follows: Mr. Pia s motion to dismiss is GRANTED without prejudice on the fiduciary duty claims. Counterclaimants may amend their counterclaim. Mr. Pia s motion is DENIED without prejudice as to all other counterclaims. Counterclaimants motion for a preliminary injunction is DENIED. Nonetheless, Mr. Pia has stipulated, and the court has ORDERED, that Mr. Pia will not to take any action or direct any action as to the film at issue here until he is allowed to do so in this action. The court further ORDERS that if any party Mr. Pia then represents is to take any action with respect to the film, Mr. Pia shall give the Counterclaimants 10 days notice prior to such action taking effect. DATED this 28th day of February, 2011. BY THE COURT: ______________________________ Clark Waddoups United States District Court Judge 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.