-BCW Arnold, et al v. Curtis, No. 2:2004cv00564 - Document 241 (D. Utah 2011)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM DECISION denying 218 Motion in Limine Regarding Evidence of Lorenzo Castillo's Status of Being in the United States. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 3/11/2011. (jtj)

Download PDF
-BCW Arnold, et al v. Curtis Doc. 241 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION VANESSA ARNOLD, ORDER and MEMORANDUM DECISION Plaintiff, vs. Case No. 2:04-cv-564 CW DEPUTY HAROLD SKIP CURTIS, a Utah County Sheriff s Deputy, Defendant. Now before the court is Defendant Harold Skip Curtis s motion in limine to allow evidence that Mr. Castillo was purportedly1 in the United States illegally. (Dkt. No. 218). That motion is DENIED. Mr. Castillo s immigration status is irrelevant to the question of whether Mr. Curtis used excessive force or took actions shocking to the conscience against Ms. Arnold. Moreover, Ms. Arnold s purported motivations for her actions are also irrelevant to the question, unless her motivations were known to Mr. Curtis at the time of the incident and were something that he actually took into account in his interaction with her. Yet Mr. Curtis does not contend that Mr. Castillo s immigration status or Ms. Arnold s knowledge thereof was something that factored into his actions in this case. For the same reasons, the court will also not allow evidence of any supposed outstanding arrest warrant against Mr. Castillo. Mr. Curtis is hereby cautioned that if he, his witnesses or his counsel make an intentional reference, direct or indirect, to Mr. Castillo s immigration status at trial, he risks a mistrial. He and/or his counsel also run the risk of sanctions, the nature of which will be determined by what 1 Mr. Curtis s motion is unsupported by any evidence of this allegation against Mr. Castillo. Dockets.Justia.com occurs at trial. SO ORDERED this11th day of March, 2011. BY THE COURT: ____________________________________ Clark Waddoups United States District Judge 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.