Eaton v. Berryhill, No. 1:2017cv00048 - Document 22 (D. Utah 2018)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER ADOPTING 21 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Commissioner's decision is reversed and remanded. On remand, Commissioner should reevaluate Plaintiff's credibility in full compliance with SSR 16-3p. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on 9/26/18 (alt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Eaton v. Berryhill Doc. 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, NORTHERN DIVISION TRAVIS E., MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:17-cv-00048-DN-EJF NANCY A BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, District Judge David Nuffer Defendant. The Report and Recommendation 1 issued by United States Magistrate Judge Evelyn J. Furse on September 6, 2018, recommends remand of the Commissioner’s decision denying Plaintiff’s claim for child insurance benefits and supplemental security income. The parties were notified of their right to file objections to the Report and Recommendation within 14 days of its service in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636 and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72. No party filed a written objection to the Report and Recommendation. Therefore, the analysis and conclusion of the Magistrate Judge are accepted, and the Report and Recommendation 2 is adopted in its entirety. The Commissioner’s decision is REVERSED, and the case is REMANDED to the Commissioner. On remand, the Commissioner should reevaluate Plaintiff’s credibility in full compliance with SSR 16-3p. ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation 3 is ADOPTED and the Commissioner’s decision is REVERSED, and the case is REMANDED to the Commissioner. On 1 Docket no. 21, filed September 6, 2018. 2 Id. 3 Id. Dockets.Justia.com remand, the Commissioner should reevaluate Plaintiff’s credibility in full compliance with SSR 16-3p. Signed September 26, 2018. BY THE COURT: David Nuffer United States District Judge 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
